BR100 Decreased By (-1%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.47%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.95%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.02%)
AGHA 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.94%)
BECO 3.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2.21%)
BML 58.71 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.45%)
BOP 27.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-2.22%)
CNERGY 12.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.4%)
CSIL 5.09 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.39%)
FCCL 49.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.74%)
FFL 13.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.98%)
FNEL 1.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.93%)
KEL 5.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.42%)
KOSM 5.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 23.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-3.72%)
MLCF 86.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-1.04%)
NBP 149.69 Decreased By ▼ -3.64 (-2.37%)
NCPL 48.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-1.79%)
NPL 53.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.8%)
OGDC 298.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.38 (-0.79%)
PACE 9.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.65%)
PAEL 32.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-2.2%)
PIBTL 12.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.41%)
PPL 210.17 Decreased By ▼ -4.03 (-1.88%)
PRL 94.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-0.63%)
PTC 45.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-3.78%)
SSGC 22.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.13%)
TBL 8.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.37%)
TELE 6.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.19%)
TPL 21.61 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (5.47%)
TPLP 11.51 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.04%)
TREET 22.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-2.55%)
TRG 52.54 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-4%)
Editorials Print edition: 2023-09-06

The GB difficulty

Published Updated

EDITORIAL: It’s a shame that religious/sectarian tensions erupt cyclically, ad nauseum, especially in and around Muharram, yet the state is always behind the curve, always putting out fires instead of preventing them.

In Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) this time, the same old story of radical extremists provoking tension, possibly violence, across the Shi’a-Sunni divide is playing out, again, and the state is playing catch up, as always.

It’s appreciated that the discontent has so far been contained, of course, but there’s a lot to say about how these things are handled; or, at least, how they ought to be handled. How difficult can it be, after all, to round everybody up, ahead of time, and warn them of very serious consequences if certain lines are crossed? It is against the law to incite sectarian hatred, almost always with bloody consequences, so why can’t we follow the example of other countries that have fared better against this menace because they pre-empted it?

Countries that have recently suffered civil wars with distinctly religious/ethnic/sectarian connotations, like Syria, made the effort to immediately erect a comprehensive national narrative, one that involved senior representatives of all religious and demographic denominations to categorically denounce all efforts to create rifts, ad infinitum, till it worked.

There’s also the reality to consider, especially at such times, that such needless controversies are extremely market negative. Big money would never park in a country that is not only flirting with default and faces bitter political tensions, but also lights up every time a radical extremist (deliberately) touches society’s raw nerves with no other aim, quite literally, than to force bloodshed.

All this can be avoided, at least better handled, by laying down the law before the traditional season for this kind of extremism begins. The state, regardless of the party in power, also needs to be a lot more transparent. By insisting all is well with a straight face while a sensitive region is a hair trigger away from combustion, the information ministry does no great service to the nation.

Ordinary people are the biggest stakeholders in the normal functioning of the country, so it’s always a bad idea to keep them in the dark about troubles that might be headed their way. Everybody understands now that such tactics are always employed when the government has been caught unawares, yet again, and will do anything to avoid bad press.

The GB chief minister has promised calm “within days”, which is welcome. Hopefully, the emergency situation, with internet and telephone lines shut down, will also normalise. Now the next big test will be making sure that this was the last such close shave with the kind of sectarian tensions that are better left in the past.

Pakistanis are not strangers to all sorts of terrorism, the sectarian kind being no exception, and they would blindly support the government in any meaningful attempt to address it permanently.

Now it is for the state, especially its security machinery, to pull its socks up and finally devise a strategy that will defuse such time bombs before anybody is able to lob them into the public.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

KU Sep 06, 2023 10:59am
If the local population is to be given an honest ear, the incident was a result of voicing support for a persecuted political party and interference in the politics of their region.
0
Tulukkan Mairandi(Salem) Sep 06, 2023 01:25pm
AZADI AZADI AZADI GIVE THEM (GB) AZADI.
0
Builder Sep 06, 2023 02:13pm
India is extremely frustrated due to world focussing on human rights violations in Manipur, Kashmir, Haryana. It's trying its best to divert attention to Pakistan, so we should be very vigilant as Indian agents are active in various regions of Pakistan.
0
TidBit Sep 07, 2023 07:07pm
@Builder, LOL. Pakistan is irrelevant in the world. Your logic is insane. India is misdirecting the world but not focussing on Pakistan. India is misdirecting the world by launching rockets to the sun and the moon, holding G20, and growing the economy. Do you see any world leaders care about Manipur?
0