AGL 22.94 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (4.13%)
AIRLINK 111.29 Increased By ▲ 6.49 (6.19%)
BOP 5.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.57%)
CNERGY 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.27%)
DCL 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.77%)
DFML 40.27 Increased By ▲ 3.87 (10.63%)
DGKC 88.00 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.09%)
FCCL 21.99 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.05%)
FFBL 42.20 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (3.03%)
FFL 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.16%)
HUBC 153.29 Increased By ▲ 3.04 (2.02%)
HUMNL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.36%)
KEL 4.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.12%)
KOSM 3.85 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.58%)
MLCF 36.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
NBP 47.99 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.13%)
OGDC 131.80 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (1.62%)
PAEL 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.28%)
PIBTL 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.84%)
PPL 115.50 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (1.01%)
PRL 22.60 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 12.58 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.48%)
SEARL 55.69 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (2.75%)
TELE 7.20 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.41%)
TOMCL 37.00 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (3.06%)
TPLP 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-3.68%)
TREET 15.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.29%)
TRG 54.55 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1%)
UNITY 31.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.44%)
WTL 1.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.68%)
BR100 8,343 Increased By 52.7 (0.64%)
BR30 26,335 Increased By 323.4 (1.24%)
KSE100 78,987 Increased By 447.9 (0.57%)
KSE30 25,365 Increased By 156.8 (0.62%)

ISLAMABAD: President Dr Arif Alvi has directed the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) to refund an amount of $11,270 as it committed maladministration by unjustly confiscating the admission dues of a student 15 years ago who vacated the seat at the initial stages and joined another university.

He said that NUST, having been established/ controlled by the federal government, fell under the definition of “agency” of the government, was not a private commercial entity but a service provider in the public sector, and confiscating the dues of a student was tantamount to exploitation and malpractice.

The president gave these directions in a 15-year-old matter, referred to him in 2022. As per details, a student was admitted to MBBS on the Foreign SAT basis session 2007 in NUST and his father (the complainant) deposited the admission fee of $11,420.

The complainant’s son got admission to another medical university of Pakistan and he applied to NUST for a refund. NUST refused his request on the basis of its Refund Policy. Feeling aggrieved, the complainant approached Wafaqi Mohtasib in 2008, which directed NUST to refund the amount.

NUST, then, filed a representation which was rejected on the ground that NUST did not explain how its policy was lawful and it failed to show that it suffered any financial loss due to the student’s decision to join another university.

Hence, the decision of NUST to retain the fee was termed as unjustified. NUST then filed a writ petition in Islamabad High Court in 2015 which asked the Mohtasib to pass a reasoned order on the questions that whether any maladministration was committed by NUST and that it was an “Agency” of the Government. Subsequently, the matter was referred to the president.

The president in his decision said that since the “provisional admission” offered to the student could not be converted into final admission and another student was admitted by NUST on the seat vacated by him; therefore, NUST charged double dues against one seat which, prima facie, was tantamount to exploitation and malpractice.

He said that the act of declining a refund in the present case amounted to “forfeiture and confiscation” which was not permissible except backed by the law.

He said that although the prospectus of the University had stated that tuition fees and Development Fund would not be refunded to applicants, the admission was neither final nor matured and NUST faced no financial loss in the instant case, and therefore, the student deserved to get a refund of his dues.

The president stated that any provision of the prospectus of NUST could not travel beyond the limit prescribed by the law and the policy or standard operating procedures (SOPs) cannot overrule the provisions of the Constitution of Pakistan, i.e., in Articles 3 and 4 regarding the elimination of exploitation and rights of individuals.

He added that since NUST had committed maladministration, therefore, it was advised to refund all the dues to the student by deducting only the admission fee of $150 as NUST had initiated some process which involved expenses which were liable to be deducted.

It was further observed that NUST was established under the Act of the Parliament namely “the National University of Science and Technology Act, 1997” having the President of Pakistan as Patron-in-Chief under Section 6 and the Prime Minister of Pakistan as Chancellor under Section 8 of NUST Act, 1997, and that having been established/ controlled by the Federal Government, and thus, NUST fell under the definition of “Agency” as defined in Article 2(1) of the Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983.

The president; therefore, directed NUST to pay the confiscated amount while only deducting $150 out of the total deposited amount of $11,420.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Pakistani1 May 13, 2023 11:34am
Finally the President has found his niche. I am told he did not show this magnanimity when it came to family property!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Abrar Ahmed May 14, 2023 09:49pm
NUST should pay interest also fir the 15 years @ 15%, so that the clowns running it should feel the pinch. They get state land at peanut price, hire retd clowns at huge salaries and cheat the people of this country. Wake up NUST
thumb_up Recommended (0)