AVN 65.52 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-1.77%)
BAFL 29.72 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.75%)
BOP 4.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.74%)
CNERGY 3.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.38%)
DFML 11.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.03%)
DGKC 42.03 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.71%)
EPCL 45.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.72%)
FCCL 11.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.11%)
FFL 5.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.7%)
FLYNG 5.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.14%)
GGL 10.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.29%)
HUBC 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.71%)
HUMNL 5.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.89%)
KAPCO 24.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.89%)
KEL 2.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.94%)
LOTCHEM 24.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.32%)
MLCF 24.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.17%)
NETSOL 74.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.08 (-2.73%)
OGDC 84.67 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.39%)
PAEL 10.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-3.98%)
PIBTL 3.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.76%)
PPL 64.81 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.8%)
PRL 12.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.62%)
SILK 0.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1.14%)
SNGP 39.41 Decreased By ▼ -1.34 (-3.29%)
TELE 7.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-5.61%)
TPLP 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-2.58%)
TRG 107.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.85 (-2.58%)
UNITY 13.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.04%)
WTL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
BR100 4,040 Decreased By -40.6 (-0.99%)
BR30 14,413 Decreased By -217.8 (-1.49%)
KSE100 39,942 Decreased By -434.1 (-1.08%)
KSE30 14,739 Decreased By -177.2 (-1.19%)
Follow us

On December 16, 2021 at a seminar at Hamdard University where Dr Miftah Ismail, who later became country’s finance minister, was the co-speaker the writer, being purely an accountant, observed that the country’s books of fiscal account, foreign currency account and energy account do not balance. There have to be some extraordinary actions before matters get out of control.

This assertion, which was made in good faith as a caution, was picked up by the opposition media and they publicized it as an admission of failure by a person who was once on a very responsible position in the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government.

This assertion was totally unjustified. In the whole presentation it was clearly demonstrated that this precarious position is not the result of good or bad performance of a government that came to power in the latter half of 2018. In fact, these accounts were never balanced in the past and the worst year was 2018.

Now in December 2022 the parties comprising Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) coalition government and PTI alike are claiming that the country is on the verge of a sovereign default or financial collapse.

The PDM government is claiming that it has successfully helped the country avert the sovereign default, holding PTI responsible for the economic slide. On the other hand, however, PTI is of the view that the incumbent government has destroyed economic consolidation that its government had achieved between 2018 and 2022.

If the statements of political parties are held to be gospel truth it means that neither party had the sense of the country’s fast emerging economic situation or both of them were not sharing the correct picture of the economy with people.

In this regard, the bigger responsibility lies with the country’s independent economists who have been maintaining meaningful silence for whatever reasons.

In this and the following articles on this subject the writer will try to demonstrate that Pakistan as a state and its people as citizens live in a state of denial. In the earlier years of 1947 and 1948 (before the Quaid’s death) there was some sense of real situation, a situation strongly characterised by, among others, the shortage of foreign exchange.

However, after the Korean War in the 1950s, the only year when Pakistan had a positive current account, the country has been continuously living in a state of denial.

Various kinds of bailouts that the country received by compromising its sovereignty and impartiality in foreign affairs further spoiled the habits of an already spoiled people. This position further worsened when foreign exchange remittances started arriving from the Pakistanis working in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Almost all of such remittances were consumed in an imprudent manner; these were never saved in an economic sense.

As a result of which, the state and the people at large became unconcerned about a perennial shortfall in the current account. A comparison with India may be employed for a deeper analysis.

The following information is contained in CIEC Data-base:


“India Current Account Balance: USD million data is updated quarterly, available from Jun 1949 to Jun 2022, with an averaged value of -344.2 USD million”.


“Pakistan Current Account Balance: USD million data is updated quarterly, available from Mar 1976 to Sep 2022, with an averaged value of -424.3 USD million”.

The aforesaid figures may not be exactly comparative as the time span is different; however, they reflect a discernable trend.

India’s economy is almost seven times bigger than Pakistan’s. However, its current account deficit, on average, is less bigger than Pakistan’s. This is enough to prove that we have spending out of other people’s grants or loans and the state and the people at large are complacent on that count.

In this respect it is also to be noted that even during the times when Pakistan had been maintaining a growth rate which was higher than India’s for the first 50 years of existence, the engine of growth was borrowed or gifted money. In short, Pakistan’s position with respect to foreign currency accounts was never comfortable.

It was the responsibility of independent economists to spell out the truth that a constant shortfall in the current account can compromise country’s economic and political sovereignty. As the President of South Asian Federation of Accountants, this writer visited Dhaka in 2008.

The Bangladeshi friends’ primary complaint in relation to economic policies prior to 1971 was borrowing in foreign currency and its utilisation in the then western part of the country.

We all forget that our capital city, Islamabad, was created by a poor country as if we making creating another Washington. But that is history. The question is whether we have learned anything from history. Unfortunately, however, the answer is in the negative.

At present, Pakistan’s foreign currency loans are over 125 billion dollars. The country’s foreign exchange reserves, including the private reserves, are around 11 billion dollars. Indian reserves are around 590 billion dollars whereas their total external debt is of 600 billion dollars.

However, it is interesting to note that the composition of foreign currency loans of India. Of the 600 billion dollar foreign debt, only 130 billion is sovereign debt, the remaining is private debt borrowed by non-government enterprises.

Firstly, it means that those loans have been used for capital purposes as both in India and Pakistan, foreign currency loans for the private sector are only allowed for capital purposes. In Pakistan, a major portion of foreign debt is sovereign debt and almost all of it was used to finance fiscal deficit.

In Pakistan, even the portfolio investments are made for that purpose. This comparison reflects the sense of denial with respect to our sustainability in relation to foreign debts. The worst part of our governance is lack of information about our foreign debt.

In India, however, a document is attached in every Budget Speech and made available publicly. Issued by the Finance Minister, it contains almost a research paper about external debt of India. In Pakistan even the total amount of liability and its repayment schedule lie somewhere in the drawer of a ‘Babu’s’ desk in the Ministry of Finance.

The primary question that arises in this situation is whether or not this issue is related to the genesis of the manner in which this state was created and run since 1947.

In an earlier article in this newspaper, the writer had stated that All India Muslim League, the party that created Pakistan, never had any dedicated session aimed at reaching an economic outlook for the country after the exit of the British colonial masters.

One day we woke up and came to know that we have a country to run without sufficient resources, experience and knowledge. The Indian National Congress, way back in the 1940s, had successfully delineated the ‘Karachi Plan’ that laid down the primary economic plan for the post-1947 period.

(To be continued tomorrow)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023


Comments are closed.

Mumtaz khan Jan 04, 2023 09:47am
The comparison with India is irrelevant……in today’s world …. the fault lies in our dysfunctional democracy , entrenched vested interests …and rulers who have no commitment to the country …and prefer to live in foreign lands to enjoy ill gotten wealth when no longer in power …
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Najeeb Sadiq Jan 04, 2023 09:55am
A painful fiscal history deluded in intentional myopic ignorance and financial suicide.It was/is criminal on the part of powers that be.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Usman Jan 04, 2023 10:49am
Instead of doing irrelevant comparisions and telling history , the economist and finance personel of this country needs to understand that the only way to reform the economy of this country is to start the Privatization and deregulate all Business especially energy sector of this country.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
M. Hassan Jan 04, 2023 01:13pm
This is an excellent article like the previous articles by the writer. Yes, he is right that Pakistan and its people are in a state of denial. They were in a state of denial when Pakistan was created. So, what did they deny at that time? Denial: People who demanded Pakistan denied that they are less educated, less creative, less innovative as compared to Hindus, Parsis, and followers of other religions. The reasons for their falling behind were not different from that of today. They don’t work hard. Pakistanis are not able to understand reality i.e., present and future. They live in the past. Rationalizations: People don’t accept their faults. They rationalize their faults by developing a narrative of perceived Hindu domination in the post-colonial sub-continent.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
M. Hassan Jan 04, 2023 03:26pm
The writer has complained about the role of Pakistani economists: “ In this regard, the bigger responsibility lies with the country’s independent economists who have been maintaining meaningful silence for whatever reasons.” Economists did not perform their role because they were not allowed to do their job. Partial responsibility goes to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) of which the writer was once the president. ICAP has very dominating and pervasive behaviour in the economy of Pakistan. It has used its political influence to eliminate or reduce competition in accountancy and economics as well. At present, one of its members is working as finance minister and is mainly responsible for continuing economic turmoil in the country. It is horrible to see that an able economist Mr. Miftah Isamail has been denied the opportunity to work because of this moron - Ishaq Dar.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Raees Ahmad Jan 04, 2023 07:35pm
We must accept that we are a corrupt nation by nature. We generated leadership of below average mentality. We have collapsed completely in all walks of life. I have been dealt with education, agriculture and livestock. All fields are giving miserable picture. New birth is needed not surgery.
thumb_up Recommended (0)

Pakistan: a state and its citizens in state of denial – I

Hamstrung by forex constraints, govt may not be able to purchase 3 more LNG spot cargoes

CPEC IPPs: EPTL threatens to shut down plant

CPEC IPPs: CPPA-G asked to stop capacity payment cuts

Economic impasse is rooted in PTI govt’s policies: PM

Umar says ‘next week to be turning point’

Four key projects: ADB sends mission to ascertain complaints’ eligibility

PM censures President’s letter

Wheat flour distribution points: PM visits Multan, other parts of southern Punjab

SECP decides to amend VPS rules

China opens ties with Honduras