BR100 Increased By (0.77%)
BR30 Increased By (0.54%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.67%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.69%)
AGHA 7.78 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.39%)
BECO 5.19 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 57.59 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-1.82%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.6%)
CNERGY 10.73 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.13%)
CSIL 5.43 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.45%)
FCCL 54.86 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (2.08%)
FFL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.58%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.44 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.2%)
KOSM 5.83 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.37%)
LOTCHEM 29.72 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.24%)
MLCF 95.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.68%)
NBP 203.75 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.11%)
NCPL 57.99 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (2.01%)
NPL 69.03 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (2.56%)
OGDC 318.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.04%)
PACE 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
PAEL 43.04 Increased By ▲ 1.27 (3.04%)
PIBTL 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
PPL 221.30 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (0.51%)
PRL 51.65 Increased By ▲ 2.60 (5.3%)
PTC 70.80 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.13%)
SSGC 28.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1.85%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.33%)
TELE 8.87 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.57%)
TPL 18.26 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (6.35%)
TPLP 12.96 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (3.6%)
TREET 22.71 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.53%)
TRG 59.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.38%)
World

US gets a voice in Epic battle with Apple

Published Updated
By

SAN FRANCISCO: The US justice department wants to have its say on Apple’s antitrust tussle with Epic Games, which is due to be heard on appeal next month – a year after a Californian court ruled largely in favor of the iPhone maker.

On Friday, the appeals court granted the department the right to send a representative to the hearing scheduled for October 21, where both sides are expected to make their case again.

In 2021 a California judge ruled against Fortnite-maker Epic, which had accused Apple of acting like a monopoly in its shop for digital goods or services.

But the judge also barred Apple from prohibiting developers from including in their apps “external links or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms.”

Apple can still mandate that its payment systems is used for in-app transactions.

Both sides are appealing.

Earlier this year the justice department asked for time at the appeal hearing to air concerns about the trial judge’s interpretation of antitrust law at issue in the case.

“The district court committed several legal errors that could imperil effective antitrust enforcement, especially in the digital economy,” justice department lawyers argued in their brief.

Justice officials have been investigating whether Apple and other tech giants are abusing their market clout with anti-competitive practices.

Attorneys for Apple, Epic and the justice department will all speak to the appeals court, which will also consider their written arguments.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.