UNITED NATIONS: UN member states edged closer Friday to finalizing a treaty to protect the high seas following two weeks of negotiations, but several disputes still needed to be overcome to reach agreement.
After 15 years, including four prior formal sessions, negotiators have yet to reach a legally binding text to address the growing environmental and economic challenges involving international waters – a zone which encompasses almost half the planet.
Many had hoped that this fifth session, which began on August 15 at the United Nations headquarters in New York, would be the last and yield a final text on “the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction,” or BBNJ for short.
A new version of the treaty – distributed to delegates on Friday morning just hours before the official end of negotiations, and seen by AFP – still included many paragraphs open to negotiation.
“We are closer than we have ever been at any time in this process to the finish line,” said conference chair Rena Lee during a short plenary session Friday afternoon to update delegates.
“But that said, we cannot be complacent. There’s still a lot more hard negotiating that we have to do in order for us to be able to get there,” she added, with observers suggesting consultations could run into Saturday.
One of the most sensitive issues revolves around the sharing of possible profits gained from developing genetic resources in international waters, where pharmaceutical, chemical and cosmetic companies hope to find miracle drugs, products or cures.
Such costly research at sea is largely the prerogative of rich nations, but developing countries do not want to be left out of potential windfall profits drawn from marine resources that belong to no one.
The new draft text seems to still side with the developing nations, with a requirement that two percent of all future sales be redistributed, eventually rising to eight percent.
Greenpeace on Thursday accused the EU, United States and Canada of rejecting the proposal out of “greed” to keep the resources for themselves, accusations denied by an EU negotiator.
Similar issues of equity arise in other international negotiations, such as on climate change, where developing nations feel outsized harms from global warming and try in vain to get wealthier nations to help pay to offset those impacts.
“The negotiations are difficult. We do not see a text that satisfies all delegations,” a diplomat from a developing country told AFP.
‘Too close to fail’
Despite that, some are hopeful for an agreement.
“This is the final stage and delegates are working hard to come to an agreement,” said Liz Karan with the NGO Pew Charitable Trusts.
Jihyun Lee, a youth ambassador with conservation group the High Seas Alliance, said: “We’re too close to fail.”
The high seas begin at the border of nations’ exclusive economic zones (EEZs) – which by international law reach no more than 200 nautical miles (370 kilometers) from each country’s coast – and are under no state’s jurisdiction.
Sixty percent of the world’s oceans fall under this category.
And while healthy marine ecosystems are crucial to the future of humanity, particularly to limit global warming, only one percent of international waters are protected.
One of the key pillars of an eventual BBNJ treaty is to allow the creation of marine protected areas, which many nations hope will cover 30 percent of the Earth’s ocean by 2030.
“Without establishing protections in this vast area, we will not be able to meet our ambitious and necessary 30 by 30 goal,” said US State Department official Maxine Burkett at a press conference.
But delegations still disagree on the process for creating these protected areas as well as how required environmental impact assessments will be implemented before new high seas activity begins.
“What a missed opportunity…”, tweeted Klaudija Cremers, a researcher at the IDDRI think tank, which, like multiple other NGOs, has a seat with observer status at the negotiations.
The delegate from Samoa, addressing the conference on behalf of the smaller developing island nations of the Pacific, said they were “disappointed.”
“We live very far and it is not cheap to travel all this way. This money was not spent on roads, on medicine, schools,” she added.
“The Pacific came here in good faith and will continue to do so until we conclude this conference in the very near future,” she said on the verge of tears, to applause from the room.
Laura Meller, of Greenpeace’s Protect the Oceans campaign, said: “Time has run out. Further delay means ocean destruction. We are sad and disappointed. While countries continue to talk, the oceans and all those who rely on them will suffer.”