BR100 Decreased By (-0.09%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.04%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.08%)
AGHA 6.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.16%)
BECO 4.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
BML 63.00 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.88%)
BOP 31.39 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.51%)
CNERGY 11.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.38%)
CSIL 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.27%)
FCCL 60.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-0.96%)
FFL 15.11 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.6%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.63%)
KEL 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
KOSM 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.72%)
LOTCHEM 24.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
MLCF 103.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-0.75%)
NBP 176.00 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.41%)
NCPL 53.06 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.55%)
NPL 54.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
OGDC 313.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.03%)
PACE 9.24 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.43%)
PAEL 35.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.7%)
PIBTL 13.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.15%)
PPL 221.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.1%)
PRL 80.20 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (1.42%)
PTC 47.40 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (1.17%)
SSGC 23.94 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.29%)
TBL 9.39 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.86%)
TELE 7.39 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPL 24.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-2.43%)
TPLP 12.64 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.04%)
TREET 26.40 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.57%)
TRG 53.50 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)
World

WTO finds US tariffs on China breach trading rules

  • A three-person panel ruled that Washington had not shown why the tariffs, imposed after an investigation into forced transfer of technology and intellectual property. It also found that the United States had not adequately explained the choice of products hit by the tariffs.
Published Updated
By

GENEVA/BRUSSELS: The World Trade Organization ruled on Tuesday that tariffs imposed by the United States on more than $200 billion of Chinese products in 2018 were inconsistent with global trading rules.

A three-person panel ruled that Washington had not shown why the tariffs, imposed after an investigation into forced transfer of technology and intellectual property, were a justifiable exception to Washington's obligations.

The panel found that the duties were inconsistent with trading rules because they applied only to China and were above the maximum rates to which the United States had committed.

It also found that the United States had not adequately explained the choice of products hit by the tariffs, or why the measures were necessary based on what Washington saw as Chinese companies' misappropriation and unfair competition.

"...The Panel recommends that the United States bring its measures into conformity with its obligations...," the report said.

The panel added that it had only looked into the US measures and not China's retaliation, which Washington has not challenged at the WTO. Noting "unprecedented global trade tensions", the three-person panel encouraged the two sides to work to resolve the overall dispute.

The United States could appeal against Tuesday's ruling. The case could then enter a legal void because Washington has blocked the appointment of judges to the appellate body, preventing it from convening the minimum number required to hear cases.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.