BR100 Increased By (1.77%)
BR30 Increased By (1.96%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.59%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.65%)
BECO 5.62 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.72%)
BML 59.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.79%)
BOP 34.61 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (2.76%)
CNERGY 8.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 12.05 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.52%)
FCCL 54.40 Increased By ▲ 2.26 (4.33%)
FCSC 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.95%)
FFL 18.05 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.22%)
FNEL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.48%)
HUMNL 11.07 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.27%)
KEL 8.05 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.68%)
KOSM 5.88 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.62%)
MLCF 90.52 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (4.64%)
NBP 190.17 Increased By ▲ 5.87 (3.19%)
PACE 11.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.03%)
PAEL 41.07 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (2.78%)
PIAHCLA 25.84 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.66%)
PIBTL 17.51 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.39%)
PPL 225.84 Increased By ▲ 3.17 (1.42%)
PRL 34.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.49%)
PTC 64.62 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.38%)
SEARL 91.38 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.02%)
SSGC 26.97 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.12%)
TELE 8.93 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.22%)
THCCL 69.16 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.01%)
TPLP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.68%)
TREET 24.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.24%)
TRG 69.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.15%)
WAVES 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
WTL 1.27 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

Defensive problems keep cropping up every now and then and many a time good defense just slips away without anyone noticing it till the post mortem reveals that with a proper defense put up the otherwise makeable contract was going down. So that makes defense the toughest aspect in Bridge to tackle. The higher the level of Bridge, the more electrifying defense is needed to break a tight contract at Bridge. As in every encounter at the Bridge table between the declarer and the defenders, it is an integral part of good defense to keep a finely tuned partnership rapport between the defenders.
In most cases, where one partner at defense is not too sharp than his partner, there is a feeling of nervous insecurity that ultimately becomes the primary cause of defensive errors of Bridge for the weaker partner is always on the edge of receiving the reprimand from his partner on not making the appropriate defense required. But like in every sport a good partnership rapport can only come when both partners realise that to err is human and therefore let the sleeping dogs lie as they are. It never pays to blame each other at Bridge as this illustration will show:
In a contract of 3NT by south after he had opened 1NT with partner responding 3S west held the following hand: 94, AJ9763, 732, Q9 and duly led his fourth best card of 7H to see the dummy spread as under:
East covered the 10H with the queen and declarer won with the king. Declarer then played the KS, a spade to the Q and the ace of spades, on which he discarded a small club. As west, what would you discard? An obvious low diamond out of the useless looking 3 low ones. OK. Good enough. Let me give the remaining hands of east and the declarer.
Seeking 8 top tricks, with 3 taken in spades, 1 in heart, 4 solid diamonds, all declarer needed was a trick in clubs with the KC to be rightly placed and kicking before AC taken by the defense lets loose a torrent of good hearts to sink the contract. Declarer needed a break-one defense blunder of the duck in clubs. To induce that, declarer deceptively played JC from dummy as if going for finessing the queen of clubs and east, in one blind spot, ducked the AC to give the declarer his game and then listen to his partner's barrage of reprimands that ducking club ace violated every known principle of no trump defense. True enough, but was it wholly justifiable? Can you spot west's error in not helping partner to the correct defense that a good partnership rapport required? Yes, west should have discarded not a low diamond to greedily keep all his hearts intact but the heart ace. For all he had to assume was that his partner held one more heart than the QH shown, which would be sufficient to yield 4 heart tricks plus the ace of clubs which would then never have been ducked by east.
Good defense requires that partners should help each other in finding the killing defense as illustrated in the next contract of 4S by south in a pairs contest, where sitting east you see partner leading 2H to the following dummy spread before you on your right as under.
South has bid spades twice with a jump. Dummy plays low and your JH wins. You shift to the JC, declarer playing the 4, partner the 8C to dummy's ace. AK of spades followed by a spade to partner's queen. The crucial point has been reached. Putting your thinking cap, what should you discard? Partner's 8C suggests he holds KC, which if not taken now would give declarer the remaining 11 tricks for a sure top with his diamonds running as declarer held the following hand:
From partner's lead of the deuce of hearts, you as east can well fathom that declarer hold a singleton heart. But only you know it, not your partner who would now surely try to under lead his KH to give you an entry for trapping declarer's QC to get 2 club tricks-that would have ended as a disaster for the defense, but at the table, the expert east threw his ace of hearts to force partner to cash his KC, which was a spectacular discard indeed!



===============
Dummy West
===============
AQ1053 94
10 AJ9763
K1054 732
J85 Q9
===============


===============
North East
(Dummy)
===============
92 J6
Q4 AJ9653
KJ10864 97
A53 J109
===============


===============
South East
===============
K7 J862
K84 Q52
AQJ8 96
K1063 A742
===============


===============
AK8753
===============
8
AQ2
Q74
===============

Copyright Business Recorder, 2017

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.