BR100 Increased By (0.98%)
BR30 Increased By (1.19%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.8%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.86%)
AGHA 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.26%)
BECO 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.74%)
BML 68.73 Increased By ▲ 3.24 (4.95%)
BOP 36.19 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.64%)
CNERGY 9.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.53%)
CSIL 6.05 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.85%)
FCCL 56.25 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (1.41%)
FFL 17.65 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.97%)
FNEL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.42%)
KEL 8.09 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.89%)
KOSM 6.11 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.99%)
LOTCHEM 31.12 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (2.27%)
MLCF 105.60 Increased By ▲ 2.83 (2.75%)
NBP 211.00 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (0.63%)
NCPL 60.65 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.58%)
NPL 69.35 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.73%)
OGDC 335.99 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (0.73%)
PACE 11.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.94%)
PAEL 45.53 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.02%)
PIBTL 18.25 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.28%)
PPL 238.18 Increased By ▲ 2.56 (1.09%)
PRL 41.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.08%)
PTC 71.56 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (1.02%)
SSGC 31.24 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.55%)
TBL 10.65 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.57%)
TELE 9.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.11%)
TPL 17.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.57%)
TPLP 12.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.63%)
TREET 25.00 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.81%)
TRG 65.55 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.58%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) sought responses from mobile companies and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) regarding poor mobile phone network services in district courts and the High Courts.

A single bench of Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar on Thursday heard a public interest petition filed by the Judicial Activism Panel.

The IHC bench sought replies from all mobile phone companies, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), secretary interior and chief commissioner Islamabad in the case of poor mobile phone network services in district courts as well as in high courts.

The IHC order said that according to the petitioner mobile phone signals in courts were either very weak or were completely non-existent due to which litigants and lawyers had to face difficulties in communicating with each other.

This has slowed down the pace of work in courts and was causing unnecessary delays in the provision of justice.

The bench observed that the points raised in the petition were worth pondering over, therefore issued the notices to the respondents.

Azhar Siddique advocate on behalf of the Judicial Activism Panel appeared before the Court and submitted that an important question of public interest has been raised in the petition that the mobile network system within the premises of the superior judiciary and district courts is not functioning properly. Mobile network signals in the courts are very weak, or there is no service at all.

He added that the lawyers and litigants have to face severe difficulties and immediate contact cannot be made during court proceedings, while access to online legal information and court-related matters is not possible. He further said that the work of the courts is slowing down and there is unnecessary delay in the delivery of justice.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining