BR100 Decreased By (-0.37%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.27%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.34%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.42%)
AGHA 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.9%)
BECO 5.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.77%)
BML 57.58 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.14%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.59%)
CNERGY 10.19 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.31%)
CSIL 5.35 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.75%)
FCCL 54.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.68%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
FNEL 1.23 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.49%)
KOSM 5.77 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 29.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.2%)
MLCF 93.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1%)
NBP 202.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-0.52%)
NCPL 57.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NPL 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.44%)
OGDC 315.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.11%)
PACE 10.64 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 42.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.49%)
PIBTL 16.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.6%)
PPL 218.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-0.43%)
PRL 51.90 Increased By ▲ 2.71 (5.51%)
PTC 70.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.11%)
SSGC 27.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-2.19%)
TBL 9.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.71%)
TELE 8.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPL 18.59 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.92%)
TPLP 13.60 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.49%)
TREET 22.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.48%)
TRG 60.15 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)

LAHORE: A mother of a deceased policyholder secures her due share out of the policy proceeds. According to details, she had filed an application for issue of succession certificate by maintaining that her son had obtained an insurance policy worth Rs1000000 from State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan in his life time. She, being mother (one of the legal heirs) of the deceased was entitled to inherit 1/6th share out of the policy amount.

However, the trial court dismissed the same and directed the insurance company to pay the entire amount to the wife of the deceased being nominee. The wife of the deceased had contended that being nominee she was solely entitled to receive the whole insurance policy amount. The trial court not only agreed with her but also held that the amount of the insurance policy does not fall within the ambit of Tarka.

However, the higher appellate forum made it clear that a nominee is typically defined as a person or entity designated to act on behalf of another, particularly in legal or financial matters. The nominee may hold assets for the benefit of the actual owner, including a fiduciary relationship. It holds bare legal title for the benefit of others or who receives and distributes funds for the benefit of others.

The forum observed that applying above test on the facts of instant case, it is persuaded to hold that the deceased was not entitled for the benevolent fund and group insurance during his life and such amounts should be deemed to be owned by him on his death and devolve upon his legal heirs as his Tarka.

Also, the policyholder can change the nominee or cancel the nomination at any time before maturity of the policy. In the event of the death of the nominee before the policy matured, the amounts secured by the policy shall be payable to legal heirs of a deceased policyholder, or legal representatives, or the holder of a succession certificate. It is nowhere mentioned that the amount would be disbursed amongst legal heirs or representatives of the nominee after his death.

The forum concluded that a nomination shall not operate as a gift or will in favour of the nominee.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.