BR100 Increased By (0.67%)
BR30 Increased By (0.83%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.43%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.44%)
BECO 6.10 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (5.72%)
BML 52.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.57%)
BOP 34.34 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.03%)
CNERGY 8.18 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.86%)
DCL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
FCCL 53.20 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.7%)
FCSC 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.58%)
FFL 18.05 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.56%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.33%)
HUMNL 10.90 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.18%)
KEL 8.14 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.5%)
KOSM 5.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.62%)
MLCF 87.00 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.57%)
NBP 187.15 Increased By ▲ 1.99 (1.07%)
PACE 10.67 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.85%)
PAEL 39.90 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.22%)
PIAHCLA 26.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 17.31 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (3.84%)
PPL 229.00 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (0.36%)
PRL 34.80 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.35%)
PTC 67.00 Increased By ▲ 1.67 (2.56%)
SEARL 90.77 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (0.71%)
SSGC 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (2.44%)
TELE 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.62%)
THCCL 58.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.48%)
TPLP 8.65 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (5.23%)
TREET 24.60 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.29%)
TRG 69.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.04%)
WAVES 9.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.5%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
Print Print edition: 2024-03-06

‘Costly’ coal purchase lands Power Div in a fix

  • 'Catch-22' situation on basis of letter written by former caretaker Federal Minister for Power and Petroleum, Muhammad Ali, who ordered a thorough probe into purchase of coal on higher prices
Published March 6, 2024 Updated March 6, 2024 10:35am

ISLAMABAD: The Power Division is reportedly facing a “Catch-22” situation on a letter of former caretaker Federal Minister for Power and Petroleum, Muhammad Ali, who ordered a thorough probe into the purchase of coal by CPEC 1,320-MW Sahiwal Coal Power Plant on higher prices, which are being paid by the consumers, well-informed sources told Business Recorder.

Muhammad Ali wrote the letter, just three days before his departure from the office of caretaker minister, purportedly on complaints he received from the stakeholders.

“Some stakeholders approached the ex-caretaker power minister and apprised him that the contract of coal being purchased by Sahiwal power plant is a long-term one which should be on a bidding basis, and presently it is not transparent as RFP was tailored for one party.

Gwadar coal-fired power plant: PPIB extends financial closing date

The ex-minister secretly probed the matters and found that there was some truthfulness that is why he ordered an inquiry to get to the bottom of the matter.

In March 2022, the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) also warned Chinese imported coal-fired power plants of implications if “legitimate” discount in coal prices is not passed onto the consumers.

The matter was referred by the highest office as serious complaints were received against Chinese imported coal-fired projects that they are siphoning money in the name of coal suppliers.

“These are very serious allegations. Please try to understand. I don’t want to caution you here but take my words very, very, very seriously. Show some very serious effort here; otherwise, I’m warning you for the last time that you will be in deep, deep, deep trouble,” warned the then Chairman Nepra Tauseef H Farooqi.

According to sources, the former caretaker minister, in his letter of March 1, 2024, wrote, reference is made to the complaints received from various stakeholders expressing serious concerns over the fairness and transparency in the bidding process of long-term coal contract in case of Sahiwal coal power.

There is an urgent need to investigate the matter and a comprehensive inquiry must be conducted covering the following aspects with report to be submitted within two weeks; (i) an audit or analysis should be conducted of coal purchases in the past and were these purchases in line with the prevailing rates. If not, what was the loss incurred which affected the consumers or the government; (ii) Why have guidelines for the procurement of coal on PKR purchase on a long-term basis not been issued by Nepra despite the fact that imported coal power plants have been in operation since a long time; (iii) how does Nepra or Power Purchaser, mandated under the relevant PPAs, ensure healthy competition while short-listing coal suppliers in the instant case; (iv) In the absence of specific guidelines from Nepra, were reasonable efforts taken to ensure that the process was transparent, fair and met the expectations of all stakeholders? Specifically, was adequate time provided to submit the bidding documents; (v) Were the terms solicited by Sahiwal Power reasonable and not specific to a supplier; (vi) despite all vendors offering payments in PKR, what criteria were used to select the impugned coal supplier in this case; (vii) given that the fuel price of coal is a pass-through item, has Nepra taken necessary steps to ensure that any potential savings arising from the agreements between the coal supplier and power producers were clawed back for the benefit of the electricity consumers, and (viii) until the inquiry is over, should all purchase contracts which are governed through an updated framework/ guideline, be halted till a standard and comprehensive mechanism is agreed upon with the stakeholders.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

T Mar 06, 2024 06:14am
every institution simply dragging their feet, no interest in working.
0
E Mar 06, 2024 09:39am
There would be many other such arrangements but fhis one came to light.
0
Aan Mar 06, 2024 09:42am
This doubts all CEPEC Power Projects. Imagine solar tariff for CEPEC is @ PKR 50 per units as compare to other solar projects of the same period but having power tariff between 20 to 35 PKR.
0
KU Mar 06, 2024 10:38am
Seems more like just another day in the corridors of the corrupt. Bigger heists are taking place in SOEs silently, and bailouts of these entities never makes news, precisely why we are bottomed out.
0