BR100 Increased By (1.02%)
BR30 Increased By (1.71%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.58%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.65%)
BECO 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.51%)
BML 52.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.74%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.71%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
DCL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
FCCL 53.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.84%)
FCSC 5.24 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.35%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.36%)
MLCF 87.90 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.61%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (0.78%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.61%)
PAEL 39.95 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.34%)
PIAHCLA 26.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.9%)
PPL 233.49 Increased By ▲ 5.31 (2.33%)
PRL 34.98 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.87%)
PTC 67.71 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (3.64%)
SEARL 90.90 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.85%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.26%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 60.85 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (4.02%)
TPLP 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (6.81%)
TREET 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.49%)
TRG 71.50 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (2.57%)
WAVES 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.7%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

KARACHI: In a recent development, the Accountability Court IV, Karachi, issued an order on February 15, returning the reference filed against Dr Asim Hussain and nine others, including Iqbal Z. Ahmed, to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Head Office through NAB Karachi. This decision stems from the court’s determination that NAB lacked jurisdiction in the matter.

The court’s order highlighted a crucial observation, stating, “... In the above reference, there is no allegation that applicants/accused intentionally misused their authority by disregarding the law to gain any monetary benefit or favour for himself or any other person related to him or his behalf. There is neither any allegation of having done the act not in good faith nor any allegation of gaining any monetary benefit as such the applicants/accused do not fall within the ambit of misuse of authority as defined by law and as enunciated under the amendments.”

The court further emphasized that there were no allegations of acting in bad faith or gaining any monetary benefit against the accused. According to the court’s findings, none of the accused violated any provision of law, and no monetary benefit was obtained by any of them.

Additionally, the court observed that, in light of the NAB Amendments, as none of the accused was in public service, the NAB Court had no jurisdiction in the matter. Consequently, the court has decided to return the reference to the NAB Head Office for appropriate disposal per the law.

This decision underscores the importance of ensuring that legal proceedings adhere to jurisdictional boundaries and establishes the need for comprehensive evaluations of allegations before pursuing legal actions.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.