BR100 Decreased By (-0.6%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.23%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.47%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.42%)
AGHA 6.70 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 56.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.43%)
BOP 30.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.86%)
CNERGY 12.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.3%)
CSIL 5.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.66%)
FCCL 52.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-1.5%)
FFL 14.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.49%)
FNEL 1.17 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (4.46%)
KEL 6.10 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.16%)
KOSM 5.94 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.66%)
LOTCHEM 26.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.13%)
MLCF 91.45 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-1.84%)
NBP 163.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-0.46%)
NCPL 53.71 Decreased By ▼ -1.95 (-3.5%)
NPL 58.92 Decreased By ▼ -2.24 (-3.66%)
OGDC 314.54 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-0.69%)
PACE 9.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
PAEL 35.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.23%)
PIBTL 14.84 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.09%)
PPL 222.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.91 (-2.16%)
PRL 91.34 Decreased By ▼ -1.68 (-1.81%)
PTC 59.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-1.99%)
SSGC 23.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-2.14%)
TBL 8.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.31%)
TPL 22.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.52%)
TPLP 12.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-3.08%)
TREET 21.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.76%)
TRG 56.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.55%)

LAHORE: Treating sales alone as income without considering purchases in order to establish suppression of sales is tantamount to invalid exercise on the part of tax department, said sources.

According to sources from tax practitioners, sales of goods invariably involves cost of sales and even gross business income is the difference of sales and cost of sales but the tax authorities carry out an invalid exercise despite having clear knowledge of sales as well as purchases declared by the taxpayer.

Obviously, they added, sales are made after having purchased the goods, therefore, treating sales alone as income without considering purchases is an illegal and baseless action as allegation of suppression of sales in the presence of purchases is not valid.

Generally, said the sources, the tax authorities carry out any such exercise after receiving a complaint that the taxpayer has underreported his sales, and thus the business income.

Accordingly, an inquiry is initiated with a conclusion that there was a definite information available to warrant amendment of the deemed assessment orders. It is followed by issuing a show-cause notice making reference to the definite information acquired by the department.

However, when the taxpayer seeks to produce evidence as regards to the costs incurred for the sales made for proper calculation of income chargeable to tax, the tax authority makes a decisive shift of terming the sale as income from other sources with the result that no deductions in relation to any other head of income is permissible in the computation of income.

This means that the costs and expenses incurred in making the concealed sales cannot be taken into account. The department, accordingly, brings the whole of the concealed income to tax at the end of the day.

Unfortunately, they said, most of the commissioner appeals also side with the department and dismiss the appeals in most of such cases. However, the tribunals carry out a deep analysis of the action and note that the tax authorities make a mistake in concluding that the costs and expenses incurred in respect of the concealed sales would not be taken into account while computing the amount that could be brought to tax.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.