AIRLINK 74.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.28%)
BOP 5.01 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.6%)
CNERGY 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
DFML 42.44 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (6.1%)
DGKC 87.02 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.78%)
FCCL 21.58 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.03%)
FFBL 33.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.92%)
FFL 9.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.62%)
GGL 10.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
HBL 114.29 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (1.37%)
HUBC 139.94 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (1.82%)
HUMNL 12.25 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (7.27%)
KEL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.33%)
KOSM 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.81%)
MLCF 38.09 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.77%)
OGDC 139.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.24%)
PAEL 25.87 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.02%)
PIAA 22.20 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (7.35%)
PIBTL 6.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 123.58 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (1.13%)
PRL 26.81 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.87%)
PTC 14.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.28%)
SEARL 58.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.76%)
SNGP 68.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.36%)
SSGC 10.47 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.65%)
TELE 8.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
TRG 63.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.53%)
UNITY 26.59 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.15%)
WTL 1.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.07%)
BR100 7,941 Increased By 103.5 (1.32%)
BR30 25,648 Increased By 196 (0.77%)
KSE100 75,983 Increased By 868.6 (1.16%)
KSE30 24,445 Increased By 330.8 (1.37%)

LAHORE: Taxation officers are accused of not proving deliberate deduction by taxpayers while disallowing expenditures under the provision-related concealment of income to impose penalties, said sources.

They said the taxation officers do not take pains to first determine the actual guilt warranting a penal action. The sources said the relevant provisions of law provide a clear exception that mere disallowance of any expenditure shall not constitute concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, unless it proved that a taxpayer deliberately claimed deduction in respect of such expenditure not actually incurred by him.

It is duty of the department to establish the same before levying any penalty, they said, adding that the burden to prove such act of a taxpayer is also on the department and mere failure to determine correct income and pay tax accordingly would not lead to imposition of penalty until it is a result of fraud or willful gross neglect.

According to the sources, tax officers prefer to take the falsity of an explanation on the part of taxpayer as sufficient cause to pose penalty. They believe that it is duty of the taxpayer to prove innocent, which is not the spirit of tax laws, they added. It is for the department to establish his guilt, as penalty could be imposed only when the department establishes a case indicating dishonest motive of taxpayer in filing a return.

According to the sources, the taxpayers must be conscious of having concealed particulars of his income in case the department has decided to pose a penalty. They said the tax officers fail to produce tangible evidence, independent of taxpayer’s explanation, before the appellate forums and ultimately fail to get a favourable decision.

Generally, they said, the department considers it sufficient to impose penalty if a taxpayer agrees with the higher assessment by the department then the returned income submitted by him. However, any such situation fails to qualify touchstone of tax laws, especially when the taxpayer is not ready to admit is as concealment of income on his part.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.