BR100 Increased By (0.11%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.26%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.12%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.09%)
AGHA 7.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.52%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 57.26 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2.39%)
BOP 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.22%)
CNERGY 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-6.5%)
CSIL 5.35 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.94%)
FCCL 54.61 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.62%)
FFL 16.70 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.46%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.95%)
LOTCHEM 29.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.01%)
MLCF 94.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.09%)
NBP 202.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.41%)
NCPL 57.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.26%)
NPL 67.78 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.7%)
OGDC 316.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.57%)
PACE 10.64 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 43.15 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (3.3%)
PIBTL 16.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PPL 220.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.15%)
PRL 49.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 70.98 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.39%)
SSGC 28.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-3.33%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.33%)
TELE 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TPL 18.14 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (5.65%)
TPLP 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (7.11%)
TREET 22.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 60.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.13%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Monday, sought the record of all the cases registered against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in the limits of the federal capital.

A single bench of Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard Imran Khan’s petition seeking the record of all cases registered against him. The court issued notices to the respondents and directed them to submit a reply in this matter till March 27.

During the hearing, Khan’s counsel Faisal Chaudhry while discussing the PTI chairman’s appearance in Judicial Complex said they had no place to go in Islamabad except the courts.

Justice Aamer said not a pleasant thing had happened on Saturday. He added; “If you commit a mistake, and then I do the same, what will be the difference left between us.” Faisal said 47 cases had been registered against Imran Khan in Islamabad, adding the police had kept some FIRs secret.

The IHC chief justice remarked that FIR could not be kept sealed. He added the FIRs were public documents and could not be kept sealed. Khan’s counsel requested the court to issue an order for producing record of all FIRs in this court’s jurisdiction.

Acceding to his request, the IHC bench issued notices to all the respondents seeking record of all the FIRs registered against Imran Khan till March 27.

Imran Khan has filed a petition seeking information regarding the number of FIRs registered against him across the country. He moved the court through advocates, Khawaja Haris, Faisal Fareed, Intazar Hussain Panjotha, and others.

In his petition, the PTI chairman cited the Secretary Interior, Inspector General Islamabad (IG) of police Islamabad, IG Punjab Police, IG Sindh Police, IG Balochistan Police and Director General (DG) Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) as respondents.

He stated that after the regime change, the petitioner has been a constant target of the respondents at the behest of the incumbent PDM government. The petitioner has been subjected to illegal and unlawful treatment by the respondents and after the dissolution of the provincial assemblies by the interim governments of Punjab and the KPK the situation deteriorated drastically and the petitioner has been nominated in criminal cases almost on a daily basis.

The PTI chairman said that an onslaught had been unleashed upon the petitioner and his party affiliates and the registration of false and frivolous FIRs had been made a new normal by the respondents and numerous FIRs had been registered against the petitioner on total baseless and false accusations.

Imran Khan maintained that registration of FIRs and criminal cases in a discreet manner by the respondents with malafide and ulterior motives manifests malafide intention and ill will to manhandle and humiliate the petitioner. He added that the abuse of power, and illegal and arbitrary exercise of authority by the respondents amount in violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner enshrined in the Constitution of Pakistan.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.