AIRLINK 74.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.6%)
BOP 5.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.97%)
CNERGY 4.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.56%)
DFML 34.25 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (3.79%)
DGKC 88.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.17%)
FCCL 22.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.29%)
FFBL 32.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.92%)
FFL 9.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.71%)
GGL 10.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.37%)
HBL 115.76 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.39%)
HUBC 136.74 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.08%)
HUMNL 9.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.6%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.65%)
KOSM 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.64%)
MLCF 39.85 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.38%)
OGDC 138.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.34%)
PAEL 25.83 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-3.94%)
PIAA 26.21 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (4.21%)
PIBTL 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.34%)
PPL 122.81 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.06%)
PRL 26.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.15%)
PTC 13.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.14%)
SEARL 58.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-1.04%)
SNGP 70.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.17%)
SSGC 10.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.67%)
TELE 8.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.04%)
TPLP 11.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.48%)
TRG 64.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-1.43%)
UNITY 26.15 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.36%)
WTL 1.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.42%)
BR100 7,826 Increased By 7.3 (0.09%)
BR30 25,481 Decreased By -95.4 (-0.37%)
KSE100 74,800 Increased By 136.4 (0.18%)
KSE30 24,133 Increased By 61.2 (0.25%)

LAHORE: Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh of the Lahore High Court on Monday referred a petition to the chief justice for constitution of a larger bench as the plea challenges the jurisdiction of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to punish persons on contempt charges under Section 10 of the Election Act 2017.

Justice Abid observed that important legal points had been raised in the petition which needed to be heard by a larger bench. In the last hearing, the court had issued notices to the respondents and also sought assistance from the attorney general of Pakistan and advocate general of Punjab on the points raised in the petition.

The petitioner, Malik Shabir Ismail, through his counsel contended that the Supreme Court in multiple cases held that the ECP was neither a court nor a tribunal; therefore, the power conferred upon it under Section 10 could not be exercised being violative to Article 2014 and Article 175 of the Constitution.

The counsel contended that the ECP had not been declared or established as a court; however, the section 10 of the Act conferred power of a court, without it being established as a court. He said any order passed by the ECP in pursuance of the section 10 of the Act was challengeable before the Supreme Court.

The counsel asked the court to declare that the section 10 of the Election Act, 2017, was violative to the Constitution and restrain the ECP from taking any action or proceedings under the impugned section.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.