BR100 Increased By (0.29%)
BR30 Increased By (0.37%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.07%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.23%)
AGHA 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.15%)
BECO 5.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-1.6%)
BOP 33.95 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.8%)
CNERGY 10.63 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (8.36%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.21%)
FCCL 53.75 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.43%)
FFL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.08%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.48%)
KEL 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
KOSM 5.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 29.87 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (2.61%)
MLCF 96.30 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.84%)
NBP 204.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.02%)
NCPL 57.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-2.03%)
NPL 67.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.5%)
OGDC 317.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.02%)
PACE 10.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.65%)
PAEL 41.90 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
PIBTL 16.78 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.7%)
PPL 220.44 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.32%)
PRL 49.05 Increased By ▲ 4.46 (10%)
PTC 69.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-1.37%)
SSGC 29.26 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.14%)
TBL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.61%)
TELE 8.89 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.48%)
TPL 17.08 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (3.83%)
TPLP 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.8%)
TREET 22.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.35%)
TRG 60.26 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.38%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday suspended the amount of Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA) qua petitioners and asked them to pay only outstanding electricity bills for the month of July within the due date.

The court also issued notices to the respondents for September 14 and directed the registrar office to club all other similar petitions on the next hearing.

The court passed the order on the petitions filed by Muhammad Sadiq and others challenging the recovery of the FPA in the electricity bills for the month of July, 2022.

SC moved against FAC hike

The petitioners’ counsel argued that the misconceived statutory interpretation of tariff determination framework by the National Electricity and Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) while calculating and charging of FPA on the basis of unverified data resulted in defective exercise of the regulator.

The counsel said that the respondent charged the FPA by violating its legal and regulatory mandate in breach of the constitution as the same is in violation of Articles 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10-A, 14, 18 and 25 of the Constitution.

He asked the court to suspend the recovery of the FPA through the electricity bills till the disposal of the petitions.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.