AIRLINK 74.56 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.42%)
BOP 5.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.04%)
DFML 37.77 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (5.39%)
DGKC 90.97 Increased By ▲ 2.97 (3.38%)
FCCL 22.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.8%)
FFBL 32.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.18%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.98 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.67%)
HBL 115.90 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 136.25 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.3%)
HUMNL 10.15 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (3.15%)
KEL 4.62 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
KOSM 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (8.58%)
MLCF 40.41 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.33%)
OGDC 138.00 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.07%)
PAEL 27.62 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (4.5%)
PIAA 24.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.79 (-6.81%)
PIBTL 6.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
PPL 123.10 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.16%)
PRL 27.02 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.24%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.36%)
SEARL 58.86 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
SNGP 70.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.3%)
SSGC 10.37 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
TELE 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.23%)
TPLP 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.58%)
TRG 64.62 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.61%)
UNITY 26.55 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.92%)
WTL 1.40 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.45%)
BR100 7,858 Increased By 19.6 (0.25%)
BR30 25,581 Increased By 121.1 (0.48%)
KSE100 75,195 Increased By 264.2 (0.35%)
KSE30 24,177 Increased By 31.4 (0.13%)

EDITORIAL: The US dollar has gained in strength in the inter-bank market as well as in the foreign exchange kerb market that reflects partly the negative sentiment in the market that is attributable to the ongoing political uncertainty but more importantly to the cessation of pledged external assistance from multilaterals as well as bilaterals (friendly countries) that are contingent on the success of the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s) seventh review.

On 10 March 2022, nine days after the announcement of the then Prime Minister’s relief package, the then Finance Minister, Shaukat Tarin, stated: “the IMF should not worry about it as neither we will take any loan nor increase our fiscal budget to manage the subsidy, but the required money would be managed by diverting dividends from shareholdings in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), cutting development funds from Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), and additional revenues collected during current fiscal year, while some of the funds would be diverted from Ehsaas Programme.”

Eleven days later on 21 March, he claimed that his final meeting with the Fund staff was scheduled for the next day and revealed that “first they (IMF) agreed that the financing for such a relief package is available through the provinces and SMEs and secondly now they are verifying whether these agreements exist or not.” It stands to reason that this was not corroborated accounting for a 24 March statement by the IMF’s Director Communications stating that “I don’t have the details on the specifics (about Pakistan) you were asking about.

But I would characterize those discussions right now as constructive to reconcile, you know, the key objectives, in fact, to try and meet the key objectives of the programme of fiscal prudence, external sector viability, due protection of vulnerable groups from high international energy and food prices.”

This status quo remains to this day and charges of a delay by the Shehbaz Sharif-led government due to its failure to take urgent politically challenging economic decisions, foremost amongst which is the withdrawal of the 28 February relief package, have become the norm.

What is being ignored are two associated foreign policy initiatives taken by the incumbent government that would strengthen the hands of the country’s economic team: (i) the official visit by the Prime Minister and his team to Saudi Arabia on 28 April, two and half weeks after taking oath, where pledges of roll over/additional assistance/deferred oil facility were reportedly made contingent on the success of the seventh review; and (ii) Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s visit on the invitation from US Secretary of State Blinken to attend the Global Food Conference with subsequent optics between the two showing a cordiality that had not been evident during the past three years. There is speculation that help may have been sought to convince the Fund to phase out its harsh upfront programme signed by the previous administration. If these foreign policy initiatives are successful then the seventh review success is perhaps imminent with phased out reforms in the energy and tax sectors though there is a general consensus that the Fund is not likely to back down from its demand to withdraw the relief package. Once the Fund programme is restored, it is to be expected that other multilateral and bilateral assistance/rollover will imply net inflows as opposed to net outflows today that in turn would strengthen the rupee.

The second measure that would strengthen the rupee is to contain the trade deficit through reducing imports. It has been reported that the government is considering an outright ban and/or massive rise in regulatory duties of those items that are consumed by well-to-do people. This too is a measure that would reduce the need for dollars and therefore strengthen the rupee. It must be borne in mind that remittance inflows have risen dramatically during the past three years and one would hope that measures to ensure that these inflows are sustained remain in focus.

And finally, there is the need to contain the budget deficit that is expected to surpass the unsustainable 9 percent of GDP mark for the current year — a factor that is fuelling the rupee erosion. This exercise, under the purview of the Ministry of Finance, appears to lack appropriate attention so far. True that the Finance Minister has requested the Federal Board of Revenue to widen the base and raise collections and granted that he may be reticent in making any serious move towards containing the deficit before the deal with the Fund is struck; however, one would have hoped for some leadership and out of the box thinking in not only curtailing expenditure but also raising revenue. Hopefully, this concern would be promptly dealt with by the economic team.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

samir sardana May 21, 2022 09:31pm
PKR breach of Rs 200 , is an opportunity 1st there should be no restrictions on imports made for exports,as the PKR has depreciated MORE THAN other nations - who compete with Pakistan,for the same export market .Agri Imports should also be secured For those import substitution is possible with existing capacities in Pakistan - import duties can be doubled on the said imports.So the people will pay more for the goods - but it will be in PKR - there will be demand destruction and PKR will stabilise Once PKR stablilises - the exporters will bring in the USD and the overseas Pakistanis will remit USD That will make the PKR rise Then all luxurious and avoidable consumption imports can be BANNED PKR at 200 is an opportunity to CUT COSTS,BE LEAN AND FOCUS ON EFFICIENCY ! This applies to consumers,state and industry ! EU and UK inflation is out of control and will get worse,industries will shutter.US gas will cross 6.5 USD soon = OPPORTUNITY FOR PAKISTAN EXPORTS ! dindooohindoo
thumb_up Recommended (0)