BR100 Increased By (0.36%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.13%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.22%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.37%)
AGHA 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 57.32 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.56%)
BOP 30.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
CNERGY 13.12 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.23%)
CSIL 5.41 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.93%)
FCCL 52.79 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.78%)
FFL 14.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.14%)
FNEL 1.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.09 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 5.73 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (15.52%)
LOTCHEM 26.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-3.25%)
MLCF 93.16 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.44%)
NBP 164.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.19%)
NCPL 55.66 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.04%)
NPL 61.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.16%)
OGDC 316.73 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-0.32%)
PACE 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.6%)
PAEL 35.63 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.37%)
PIBTL 14.68 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.75%)
PPL 226.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-0.39%)
PRL 93.02 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.49%)
PTC 60.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.61%)
SSGC 23.81 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
TBL 8.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.81%)
TELE 7.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.26%)
TPL 22.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.54%)
TPLP 12.97 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.37%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.69%)
TRG 56.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-2.15%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been approached to refund taxes collected under section 7E (deemed income tax on immovable property) and Super Tax under section 4C (tax on high earners), seeking a clear, policy-level mechanism for taxpayers to reclaim amounts paid or recovered.

The refunds have been claimed under these two contested provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, in the wake of judgments by the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC).

Waheed Shahzad Butt, an Advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, has written to FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial, routed through the Member (Policy-IR), Member (IR-Operations) and Member (IR-Legal), arguing that taxpayers are now in an “untenable legal and financial position” because the taxes have been collected but no refund procedure has been notified.

READ MORE: FY27: IMF projects Rs15.3trn tax collection

On Section 7E, the so-called “deemed income” tax on immovable property, the FCC struck down the provision, declaring it unconstitutional and void from the outset, and set aside all notices and proceedings initiated under it.

The provision, introduced through the Finance Act 2022, had applied to properties valued above Rs25 million and imposed a levy based on five per cent of FBR-assessed fair market value.

In case of Super Tax, the FCC upheld the constitutional validity of the super tax, while excluding certain exempt capital gains from its scope. The court reasoned that the super tax is an additional tax on income, deriving legislative authority from Entry 47, Part I of the Federal Legislative List of the Constitution.

The decisive corollary, as summarised by legal commentators, is that super tax cannot be levied on the sale of immovable property, where the asset was held beyond a prescribed period, was inherited, or is otherwise exempt.

The clarification request asks the Member (Policy-IR) to issue clear, policy-level guidance specifying the procedure through which taxpayers may claim refunds of income tax recovered under Section 7E and Super Tax, direct field formations to ensure uniform treatment of such refund claims across all tax jurisdictions and communicate any prescribed form, application format, or designated forum for filing them.

Waheed Butt emphasised that the matter involves binding constitutional court pronouncements and that the continued withholding of these amounts without a clear refund route warrants expeditious, priority guidance.

Super Tax charged on already-exempt income would be refundable under the ruling while Section 7E refund universe is potentially much wider, since that levy was struck down in its entirety. As of the date of the request, the FBR had not notified a dedicated refund mechanism for either head, leaving affected taxpayers without a clear path to recover sums now declared unlawful or inapplicable, Waheed added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining
Syed Imtiaz Abbas Hussain May 19, 2026 09:29pm
Yes I agreed. Many cases come across me about illegal notices under 7E of ITO, which was withdrawn immediately by FBR on submission of replies. Many innocent taxpayers trapped who not replied.
0 Reply