BR100 Decreased By (-0.74%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.63%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.79%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.9%)
AGHA 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.79%)
BECO 5.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.34%)
BML 57.80 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.52%)
BOP 33.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.71%)
CNERGY 9.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.3%)
CSIL 5.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.56%)
FCCL 53.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-1.66%)
FFL 16.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.23 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.03%)
KOSM 5.84 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.21%)
LOTCHEM 29.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.75%)
MLCF 91.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.56 (-2.71%)
NBP 201.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.9%)
NCPL 56.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.53%)
NPL 66.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.18%)
OGDC 314.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.59 (-0.5%)
PACE 10.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.85%)
PAEL 41.91 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-2.99%)
PIBTL 16.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.03%)
PPL 217.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.98 (-0.9%)
PRL 50.37 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (2.4%)
PTC 69.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-1.45%)
SSGC 26.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-4.5%)
TBL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.81%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.48%)
TPL 18.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.99%)
TPLP 13.41 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.06%)
TREET 22.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.1%)
TRG 59.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.4%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled ‘How Trump pushed the world towards Beijing’ carried by the newspaper yesterday. Canada’s experience became a defining case study. Accusations of economic exploitation, sweeping tariff threats, and rhetoric that questioned Canada’s sovereignty struck at the heart of a relationship built on the world’s deepest bilateral trade integration.

For Ottawa, the conclusion was stark. Dependency on a single market had become a strategic risk. The response was not submission, but diversification. Trade corridors were widened toward the European Union through CETA, expanded across the Asia-Pacific via the CPTPP, and recalibrated toward energy and investment ties with the Gulf and Asia. China, as the world’s largest trading nation, inevitably became central to this recalibration—not by ideological alignment, but by economic gravity.

Europe’s pivot followed a parallel but more consequential path. The dispute over Greenland, framed by Washington as a strategic necessity for missile defense and Arctic dominance, was read in European capitals as a unilateral assertion of power that disregarded sovereignty and alliance consultation. The European Union, often divided on policy, responded with rare cohesion. The rejection of American demands was not merely territorial—it was systemic. It reflected a growing determination to insulate Europe’s political and economic future from what it increasingly viewed as unpredictable American pressure.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former Press Secretary to the President, An ex-Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France, a former MD, SRBC Macomb, Detroit, Michigan

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.