BR100 Increased By (0.48%)
BR30 Increased By (0.45%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.19%)
BECO 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
BML 57.65 Increased By ▲ 4.90 (9.29%)
BOP 34.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.29%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
DCL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.54%)
FCCL 54.08 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.35%)
FCSC 5.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.53%)
FFL 18.12 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.5%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.54%)
HUMNL 11.21 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.91%)
KEL 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 88.82 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.87%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.06%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.28%)
PAEL 40.64 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.75%)
PIAHCLA 26.33 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.61%)
PIBTL 17.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 232.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.01%)
PRL 34.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
PTC 66.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-1.02%)
SEARL 91.55 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.68%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
TELE 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
THCCL 64.86 Increased By ▲ 4.73 (7.87%)
TPLP 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.74%)
TREET 24.77 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.94%)
TRG 73.00 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (1.74%)
WAVES 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (7.21%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled ‘How Trump pushed the world towards Beijing’ carried by the newspaper yesterday. Canada’s experience became a defining case study. Accusations of economic exploitation, sweeping tariff threats, and rhetoric that questioned Canada’s sovereignty struck at the heart of a relationship built on the world’s deepest bilateral trade integration.

For Ottawa, the conclusion was stark. Dependency on a single market had become a strategic risk. The response was not submission, but diversification. Trade corridors were widened toward the European Union through CETA, expanded across the Asia-Pacific via the CPTPP, and recalibrated toward energy and investment ties with the Gulf and Asia. China, as the world’s largest trading nation, inevitably became central to this recalibration—not by ideological alignment, but by economic gravity.

Europe’s pivot followed a parallel but more consequential path. The dispute over Greenland, framed by Washington as a strategic necessity for missile defense and Arctic dominance, was read in European capitals as a unilateral assertion of power that disregarded sovereignty and alliance consultation. The European Union, often divided on policy, responded with rare cohesion. The rejection of American demands was not merely territorial—it was systemic. It reflected a growing determination to insulate Europe’s political and economic future from what it increasingly viewed as unpredictable American pressure.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former Press Secretary to the President, An ex-Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France, a former MD, SRBC Macomb, Detroit, Michigan

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.