BR100 Decreased By (-1.39%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.72%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-1.3%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.25%)
AGHA 7.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.1%)
BECO 5.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.33%)
BML 59.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.22%)
BOP 33.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.49%)
CNERGY 9.81 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.98%)
CSIL 5.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.45%)
FCCL 53.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.16%)
FFL 16.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.95%)
FNEL 1.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.63%)
KEL 7.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.16%)
KOSM 5.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.23%)
LOTCHEM 29.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-4.34%)
MLCF 95.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.66 (-2.71%)
NBP 204.35 Decreased By ▼ -4.44 (-2.13%)
NCPL 58.24 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-2.3%)
NPL 67.79 Decreased By ▼ -2.08 (-2.98%)
OGDC 317.94 Decreased By ▼ -5.42 (-1.68%)
PACE 10.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.25%)
PAEL 41.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.99%)
PIBTL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.9%)
PPL 219.74 Decreased By ▼ -4.99 (-2.22%)
PRL 44.59 Increased By ▲ 2.94 (7.06%)
PTC 70.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.49%)
SSGC 28.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.3%)
TBL 9.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.2%)
TELE 8.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.56%)
TPL 16.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.42%)
TPLP 12.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-5.25%)
TREET 22.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.13%)
TRG 60.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.69%)

Electricity demand and generation patterns aren’t supposed to transform dramatically within just two years. Yet the hourly profiles for September 2025 versus September 2023 reveal a power system undergoing rapid, bottom-up change — one driven less by central planning and more by the uncoordinated surge of rooftop solar and shifting industrial behavior.

The contrast between the two years is unmistakable. What was once a smooth, balanced curve has turned into a deep midday valley followed by a sharp evening climb. Both demand and generation dip steeply between hours 9 and 14, bottoming out near 14,000 GWh — roughly 3,000 GWh below comparable 2023 levels — before rebounding above 20,000 GWh in the evening.

This is the unmistakable imprint of solar power: when the sun is high, self-generation peaks and grid demand collapses; as the sun sets, consumers return en masse, forcing the system to ramp up costly thermal plants at short notice.

The shift is structural, not seasonal. The generation curve mirrors the same pattern, revealing how midday solar output is crowding out conventional supply before an evening scramble to meet surging demand.

The data also hints at another layer of change — the partial return of industrial captive users to the grid. The early-morning uptick in demand suggests that some industries, facing high fuel costs or supply constraints, are now drawing more power from the system.

The result is a grid grappling with both reduced daytime load and intensified evening stress — a volatility it was never designed to handle.

For policymakers, the implications are profound. Pakistan’s planning and forecasting models still revolve around annual demand growth and static capacity targets. But as the latest hourly data shows, the real challenge is no longer how much power the country needs — it’s when that power is needed. A system built around baseload plants is now facing the classic “duck curve,” where solar’s rise creates midday surpluses and evening shortfalls.

The priority now must shift to flexibility: fast-ramping plants, battery storage, and demand-side management tools that can smooth the peaks and troughs. Equally urgent is a rethink of the net metering framework. What began as a welcome incentive for adoption has, in its unchecked form, started distorting costs.

Without rationalization, the burden of balancing evening demand will increasingly fall on non-solar consumers, deepening inequities and fiscal stress in a sector already weighed down by circular debt.

Net metered purchase by the CPPA in nine months of 2025 at 1.4 billion units has trebled from a year ago. Some estimates now put, behind-the-meter and off-grid capacities touching 35 GW – with over 50 GW already imported in.

Pakistan’s energy transition is unfolding faster than official forecasts or regulatory frameworks can keep up with. If planning continues to look backward, the grid will become increasingly mismatched to reality: oversupplied in daylight, strained after sunset, and perpetually short of cash.

The power curve has already bent. Whether policy bends with it — toward flexibility, foresight, and fairness — will determine if this transition brings stability or yet another imbalance to Pakistan’s energy future.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Ferraro Nov 10, 2025 06:40am
This all came about due to ever increasing electricity cost and powerr outages. Consumers found solution to their problem. Supplier ahould also find solution for its worries.
0
Waheed ud din Nov 10, 2025 11:20am
Please look in the right direction to address issues being faced by Power sector. Reduce buy back rates from solar power generation as a first step. Try to reduce cost of energy storage systems
0
Faisal Khan Nov 11, 2025 04:39pm
There can be a short and long term solution. In the short term govt. must not waste any more $ on importing solar panels unless they are manufactured in house. thus reducing trade deficit.
0
Faisal Khan Nov 11, 2025 04:41pm
Long term increasing buy back rates govt can force roof tops for storage solutions. Alternatively, govt can invest in Bulk storage but has no money.
0
Faisal Khan Nov 11, 2025 04:42pm
This can then result in grid consumption and reduce basket price for all. Currently, Govt. is too much focused in the 3-5% roof tops at the cost of all consumers. Thus losing their vote bank as well.
0
Faisal Khan Nov 11, 2025 04:47pm
@Waheed ud din, If buy backs reduced the basket price for rest increases. Govt is short of options. They create a mess and dont know how to get out. same as CNG crisis in musharaf era, LNG crisis now.
0
Zia Ullah Khan Nov 11, 2025 04:49pm
Nothing extraordinary. The system already takes care of extra evening load by charging peak load higher slabs. But no system can cope if we install double the peak load thermal capacity.
0