BR100 Increased By (1.37%)
BR30 Increased By (1.27%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.11%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.17%)
AGHA 7.85 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.29%)
BECO 5.21 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.39%)
BML 58.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.12%)
BOP 34.61 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (2.73%)
CNERGY 10.82 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.98%)
CSIL 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.83%)
FCCL 54.75 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (1.88%)
FFL 16.76 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.82%)
FNEL 1.22 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.34%)
KOSM 5.70 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.06%)
LOTCHEM 29.95 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.01%)
MLCF 97.00 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (0.66%)
NBP 206.49 Increased By ▲ 2.96 (1.45%)
NCPL 58.22 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.41%)
NPL 69.40 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (3.11%)
OGDC 321.55 Increased By ▲ 3.33 (1.05%)
PACE 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
PAEL 42.81 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (2.49%)
PIBTL 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (2.14%)
PPL 223.75 Increased By ▲ 3.58 (1.63%)
PRL 51.90 Increased By ▲ 2.85 (5.81%)
PTC 71.00 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (1.41%)
SSGC 29.64 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.72%)
TBL 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
TELE 9.01 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.15%)
TPL 17.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.92%)
TPLP 13.02 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (4.08%)
TREET 22.94 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.55%)
TRG 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.42%)

LAHORE: The Customs department has failed to prove tampering with the digits of the chassis of a crane confiscated on the presumption of smuggling, said sources.

The department had alleged that the chassis number of the vehicle was self-made/fake-digits by the owner.

However, the owner was of the view that manual punching of the chassis number did not suggest any action of tampering/manipulation of the chassis as the concerned local auto manufacturing/assembling company invariably inscribes the chassis numbers on its locally produced chassis frames by way of manual proficiency.

Furthermore, the owner had also placed record on the basis of registration of the vehicle in question evidencing that the same was purchased from the concerned local manufacturing/assembling company, which invariably uses to punch/inscribe the chassis numbers on locally produced vehicles by way of manual proficiency.

Interestingly, said sources, the owner of the vehicle had also offered the department to get documents and manual punching of the chassis number checked from the company, which was not done by the said Collectorate, a clear deviation from the provisions of the law. Once the owner having discharged his burden of proof, it was on the Collectorate to controvert the same but it failed to negate the registration of the vehicle with the concerned registration authority.

It is also worth noting that even the Forensic Science Laboratory had not suggested any act of tampering. In absence of any report that digits of the chassis were disturbed by making any tampering with it, the confiscation of locally assembled vehicle was not in accordance with law and facts.

It is further worth mentioning that the staff of the department issued a detention memo at the time of seizure without assigning any charge with respect to its chassis. According to the owner of the vehicle, it was a rowing inquiry with the aim and object to shoot in the dark and getting something in reward.

Therefore, the relevant appellate forum set aside the show cause notice and directed the department to release the crane unconditionally.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.