BR100 No Change (0%)
BR30 No Change (0%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.16%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
AGHA 7.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.65%)
BECO 5.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.95%)
BML 60.22 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.35%)
BOP 35.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-3.24%)
CNERGY 13.13 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (9.97%)
CSIL 6.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.97%)
FCCL 57.97 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.06%)
FFL 16.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.97%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.48 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.19%)
KOSM 6.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
LOTCHEM 27.75 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (2.25%)
MLCF 102.98 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (0.89%)
NBP 206.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.15%)
NCPL 62.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.61%)
NPL 71.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.96%)
OGDC 323.78 Increased By ▲ 4.59 (1.44%)
PACE 11.51 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.14%)
PAEL 43.90 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.05%)
PIBTL 16.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.95%)
PPL 229.47 Increased By ▲ 7.92 (3.57%)
PRL 70.11 Increased By ▲ 6.36 (9.98%)
PTC 72.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.36%)
SSGC 27.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.62%)
TBL 9.86 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.72 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.16%)
TPL 22.62 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (9.38%)
TPLP 15.68 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (4.67%)
TREET 24.21 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.46%)
TRG 61.13 Decreased By ▼ -2.16 (-3.41%)

ISLAMABAD: In a recent development, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has dismissed the appeal filed by Eden Builders (Pvt) Ltd, upholding the decision of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) regarding misleading advertising claims about their housing project.

In 2018, the CCP imposed a penalty of PKR 2.5 million on Eden Builders for deceptive marketing campaigns related to their ‘Eden Life Islamabad’ project, violating Section 10 of the Competition Act, 2010.

The CCP determined that Eden Builders’ claims were misleading. Specifically, their advertisement featured an illegible disclaimer about additional development charges not included in the quoted price, which was held misleading and tantamount to an omission of material price related information, thus violating Section 10 of the Competition Act.

The allusion in the advertisement of approval by CDA was also held to be a false and misleading claim, as there was no such approval.

Eden Builders filed an appeal against the CCP’s order before CAT. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld CCP’s order regarding Eden Builders’ violations of Section 10 of the Act.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.