BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
AGHA 6.35 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.47%)
BECO 4.39 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.81%)
BML 62.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.08%)
BOP 31.47 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.77%)
CNERGY 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.95%)
CSIL 5.92 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (3.5%)
FCCL 61.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.53%)
FNEL 1.23 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.33 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.12%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.12%)
LOTCHEM 24.79 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.45%)
MLCF 103.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.14%)
NBP 173.05 Decreased By ▼ -2.23 (-1.27%)
NCPL 51.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-1.74%)
NPL 54.19 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.13%)
OGDC 315.50 Increased By ▲ 2.11 (0.67%)
PACE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.65%)
PAEL 35.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.81%)
PIBTL 13.65 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.34%)
PPL 226.60 Increased By ▲ 4.79 (2.16%)
PRL 80.30 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (1.54%)
PTC 46.89 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.09%)
SSGC 23.90 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.13%)
TBL 9.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
TELE 7.65 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.52%)
TPL 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.39%)
TPLP 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (4.24%)
TREET 26.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.76%)
TRG 53.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.11%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has recommended the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to recover multi-million unchallenged tax demand from a Chinese company through Embassy of China and Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pakistan.

It is reliably learnt that landmark order has been issued by FTO Dr Asif Jah in a public interest complaint moved by a tax lawyer Waheed Shahbaz Butt, against the FBR officers for their delay in recovery of unchallenged tax demand runs into Rs632 million against a Chinese company.

FTO order stated, “Complaint was filed against alleged non-recovery of undisputed tax demand created in the case of a Chinese company.

The complainant has highlighted the non-recovery of unchallenged tax demands from Respondents, which allegedly appears to be intentionally ignored by the FBR/CTO/RTO. Inaction is solely aimed at providing unholy benefits to some senior officers within the organization/FBR. The Complainant has emphasised the gravity of the situation and the implications it has for the integrity and credibility of the FBR. The Complainant further states that the deliberate negligence in recovering unchallenged tax demand not only undermines the principles of fairness and justice but also raises questions about the ethical conduct of certain senior officers entrusted with crucial responsibilities within the FBR. Furthermore, it has been observed that the FBR has failed to initiate any action or take measures to recover unchallenged tax demand on the basis of orders passed u/s 122(5A) read with (2022 PTD 1839) for the Tax Years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011 and 2012.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.