BR100 Increased By (0.53%)
BR30 Increased By (0.55%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
BECO 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
BML 57.95 Increased By ▲ 5.20 (9.86%)
BOP 34.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.1%)
DCL 12.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.97%)
FCCL 54.34 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.84%)
FCSC 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.57%)
FFL 18.12 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.5%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.29 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.64%)
KEL 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 89.15 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (1.25%)
NBP 186.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.09%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.28%)
PAEL 40.36 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 26.39 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.84%)
PIBTL 17.40 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.46%)
PPL 233.49 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (0.31%)
PRL 34.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.43%)
PTC 67.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-0.61%)
SEARL 91.03 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.11%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
TELE 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
THCCL 64.90 Increased By ▲ 4.77 (7.93%)
TPLP 9.09 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.77%)
TREET 24.75 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.86%)
TRG 73.21 Increased By ▲ 1.46 (2.03%)
WAVES 10.57 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (5.91%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman, on Monday, after removing objections against the SC Registrar’s Office, filed an appeal against the Islamabad High Court (IHC)’s order dated 3rd August 2023.

The Registrar’s Office Supreme Court on August 5 returned PTI chief Imran Khan’s petition against the IHC’s order.

The IHC had set aside the trial court’s verdict over the maintainability of Toshakhana case against Imran Khan. It had also turned down the PTI chairman’s appeal to transfer the case to another court and remanded the matter to a trial court to decide it afresh.

Khawaja Haris Ahmed, on behalf of Imran Khan, filed the appeal against the IHC’s order and requested the apex court to direct that the proceedings before the trial court shall remain suspended.

He raised the objection that Chief Justice IHC Aamir Farooq in remanding the case to the trial judge has misconstrued the submission made as he had argued that the case be remanded to any judge other than the judge, who had passed the order impugned in the IHC on the grounds other than bias.

He submitted that the IHC has seriously erred in law in remanding the case to the same judge who had earlier passed the order in a “cursory and shoddy” manner and had already disclosed his mind qua the objections raised before him.

The single judge erred in not placing reliance on and following the dictum laid down by this Court in the judgement reported as PLD 1960 SC 18.

The judgments relied upon by the single judge in refusing to remand the matter for decision afresh to a judge other than the judge had passed in the order impugned in criminal revision petition No108/ 2023 are wholly inapplicable on law and facts to the instant case and as such, the impugned judgment of the IHC is not warranted by the law.

The manner in which the impugned order was passed by the single judge of the IHC is in breach of the fundamental rights of the petitioner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.