BR100 Decreased By (-1.21%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.49%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-1.3%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.25%)
AGHA 7.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.98%)
BECO 5.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.76%)
BML 59.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)
BOP 33.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.14%)
CNERGY 9.79 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.77%)
CSIL 5.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.82%)
FCCL 53.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.65%)
FFL 16.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.83%)
FNEL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.81%)
KEL 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.43%)
KOSM 5.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.41%)
LOTCHEM 29.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-4.04%)
MLCF 96.09 Decreased By ▼ -2.07 (-2.11%)
NBP 205.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.29 (-1.58%)
NCPL 58.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.41 (-2.37%)
NPL 67.86 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.88%)
OGDC 318.00 Decreased By ▼ -5.36 (-1.66%)
PACE 10.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.8%)
PAEL 42.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.59%)
PIBTL 16.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.49%)
PPL 220.39 Decreased By ▼ -4.34 (-1.93%)
PRL 44.55 Increased By ▲ 2.90 (6.96%)
PTC 71.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.15%)
SSGC 28.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.4%)
TBL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.1%)
TELE 8.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.67%)
TPL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
TPLP 12.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-4.54%)
TREET 22.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.04%)
TRG 60.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.74%)

Though the government has established a revolving fund aimed at providing urgent relief in hardships and deserving cases of human rights violations, including; kidnappings, rapes, police encounters, arrests of women, extra-judicial killings and tortures yet not a single penny has not been spent and this fund is likely to lapse this year.
A number of people attached with the ruling party had applied for compensation/ financial assistance but they have been declared non-deserving. Sources said that due to lack of publicity deserving people could not apply.
The sources said that like last year, the Human Rights Revolving Fund might be returned to the Finance Division, as the majority of the applications received by the ministry did not 'meet the criteria'.
Only those people were applying for financial assistance whose kinsmen had earlier applied for it, and, as such, they were not entitled to receive the financial assistance, the sources said.
The sources, however, said that this year, too, most of the applicants had sought relief for medical care, marriages of sons and daughters and for addressing their hunger and poverty.
"This is only due to lack of publicity on the part of the ministry, as the deserving people were not aware of the fund, which ultimately lapsed," the sources said.
During the course of audit carried out in 2003-04 and 2004-05, it was noticed that the management had made an expenditure of Rs1,799,345 from the funds against the laid-down objective and disbursement procedure.
According to the list of disbursement of financial assistance provided by the management relating to 2003-04, the entire financial assistance from the revolving fund was given to beneficiaries belonging to the constituency of the law minister. In 2004-05, out of the 485 beneficiaries, 305 belonged to only one district ie Faisalabad.
One senior bureaucrat of the ministry had made headlines in May 2006 when she was reported to have opposed Law Minister Wasi Zafar on the disbursement of a major chunk of the ministry's human rights funds to applicants from the minister's home constituency.
Meanwhile, an official told that should they fail to receive applications from deserving people, the remaining funds of Rs1.9 million could lapse next month.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.