BR100 Increased By (0.36%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.13%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.22%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.37%)
AGHA 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 57.32 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.56%)
BOP 30.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
CNERGY 13.12 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.23%)
CSIL 5.41 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.93%)
FCCL 52.79 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.78%)
FFL 14.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.14%)
FNEL 1.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.09 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 5.73 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (15.52%)
LOTCHEM 26.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-3.25%)
MLCF 93.16 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.44%)
NBP 164.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.19%)
NCPL 55.66 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.04%)
NPL 61.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.16%)
OGDC 316.73 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-0.32%)
PACE 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.6%)
PAEL 35.63 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.37%)
PIBTL 14.68 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.75%)
PPL 226.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-0.39%)
PRL 93.02 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.49%)
PTC 60.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.61%)
SSGC 23.81 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
TBL 8.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.81%)
TELE 7.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.26%)
TPL 22.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.54%)
TPLP 12.97 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.37%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.69%)
TRG 56.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-2.15%)

LAHORE: Kissan Ittehad Pakistan on Saturday rejected the proposed federal budget for FY2026-27, terming it anti-farmer and accusing the government of ignoring the country’s agriculture sector despite its critical role in the national economy.

In his reaction to the proposed budget, Kissan Ittehad Chairman Khalid Hussain Bath said the farming community had pinned high hopes on the federal budget and expected substantial relief measures to reduce production costs. However, he said the government failed to provide any meaningful support to farmers.

Bath remarked that while the world acknowledges the diplomatic efforts of Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in easing tensions during the Iran-US conflict, the government had disappointed farmers by excluding their concerns from the budget.

He criticised the finance minister for not even mentioning agriculture and farmers during the budget speech, calling it a reflection of the government’s lack of seriousness toward a sector that remains the backbone of Pakistan’s economy.

“Neglecting agriculture and farmers is tantamount to neglecting the country’s economic development,” Bath said, adding that farmers had expected relief on five key agricultural inputs, including fertilisers, pesticides, seeds, diesel and electricity.

According to him, no relief was announced on any of these essential inputs, leaving farmers burdened with rising production costs and shrinking profitability.

The Kissan Ittehad chairman warned that if subsidies on fertilisers and diesel are not announced by June 30, the organisation will launch a protest movement across the country.

He maintained that farmers would play a decisive role in laying the foundation for economic growth during fiscal year 2026-27, but this would only be possible if they receive adequate policy support and financial relief.

Bath further vowed to expose what he termed as corrupt mafias operating within the agricultural system and asserted that farmers would not remain silent if their rights continued to be ignored.

“If farmers are not given their due rights, they will secure them through democratic struggle,” he said, adding that the entire farming community would take to the streets if the government failed to announce relief measures before the end of June.

The Kissan Ittehad urged the federal government to immediately review its budgetary priorities and introduce targeted support measures for the agriculture sector to safeguard food security, rural livelihoods and economic growth.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining
KU Jun 14, 2026 12:08pm
Meaningless pursuits by Kissan Ittehad n every farmer knows it. Was the Chairman Kissan Ittehad asleep during last year or many years, when farmers faced unaffordable costs n crop price plunder?
0 Reply