BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
AGHA 6.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.95%)
BECO 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.87%)
BML 62.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.16%)
BOP 31.39 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.51%)
CNERGY 11.73 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.21%)
CSIL 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.32%)
FCCL 61.71 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.28%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.53%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
KEL 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.96%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.12%)
LOTCHEM 24.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
MLCF 103.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.14%)
NBP 173.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-1.12%)
NCPL 51.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.78%)
NPL 54.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
OGDC 315.87 Increased By ▲ 2.48 (0.79%)
PACE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.65%)
PAEL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.61%)
PIBTL 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
PPL 226.07 Increased By ▲ 4.26 (1.92%)
PRL 80.28 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.52%)
PTC 46.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.45%)
SSGC 23.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
TBL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.17%)
TPL 24.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.27%)
TPLP 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (3.84%)
TREET 25.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.03%)
TRG 53.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.21%)

ISLAMABAD: A research study conducted by the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) found that, contrary to widespread concerns, there is no evidence of backlash, loss of empowerment, or decline in household well-being after women exit the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP).

The PIDE research study provides important and reassuring evidence on what happens when women stop receiving cash transfers under Pakistan’s flagship social protection programme. The BISP is Pakistan’s largest social safety net that provides income support to more than 5 million poor and vulnerable families. The long-term objectives of the programme include supporting the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to eradicate extreme and chronic poverty, to empower women, and to achieve universal primary education.

The study, titled “When Cash Stops: What Happens When Women Suddenly Stop Receiving Cash Transfers?” and authored by Dr Nasir Iqbal, Amen Jalal, Mahreen Mahmud, and Kate Vyborny, addresses a critical gap in global policy research; while much is known about the benefits of entering cash transfer programmes, very little is understood about what happens when payments stop.

The research leverages a unique policy moment — BISP’s nationwide recertification based on an updated Proxy Means Test (PMT). In 2022, many previously eligible households became ineligible overnight, creating a natural comparison between women who continued receiving transfers and those who lost eligibility despite prior participation. Focusing on households near the eligibility cutoff in Layyah district, the study employs a rigorous regression discontinuity design combined with panel data to isolate the causal effects of programme exit.

One year after exiting BISP, the study finds no increase in intimate partner violence, no deterioration in marital relationships or mental health, no decline in women’s decision-making power or mobility, no reduction in women’s economic participation, and no negative effects on children’s schooling or labour. The results are precise enough to rule out even modest negative impacts on key indicators of women’s empowerment.

Cash transfers to women are widely recognized for improving agency, bargaining power, and welfare, but policymakers have long worried that these gains might reverse once transfers stop, potentially triggering household conflict or social backlash. This study challenges that assumption, suggesting that empowerment gains may persist beyond the life of the transfer, possibly due to learning and habit formation within households, lasting recognition of women’s financial role, and adjustment through other income sources.

Importantly, even though BISP payments were often the only income directly controlled by women, they constituted a relatively small share of total household expenditure, allowing households to adjust without destabilizing gender dynamics. For policymakers in Pakistan and beyond, the results carry significant weight.

Recertification and graduation processes can proceed without fear of immediate gender backlash, costly protective interventions for exiting beneficiaries may not be necessary on gender grounds alone, and program design can focus more confidently on targeting efficiency. However, PIDE researchers caution that these findings are context-specific: they apply to households near the eligibility cutoff rather than the ultra-poor, cover only a one-year window rather than long-term outcomes, and economic adjustments within households remain harder to measure precisely.

The study delivers a clear and policy-relevant conclusion: for women near the BISP eligibility threshold, exiting cash transfers do not undo empowerment gains or trigger household conflict, at least in the short run. This evidence strengthens the case for dynamic and data-driven social protection systems, where entry and exit are managed efficiently without unintended social costs. The Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) is a premier research think tank committed to producing rigorous, evidence-based policy insights to inform Pakistan’s development agenda.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.