BR100 Increased By (0.11%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.26%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.12%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.09%)
AGHA 7.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.52%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 57.26 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2.39%)
BOP 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.22%)
CNERGY 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-6.5%)
CSIL 5.35 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.94%)
FCCL 54.61 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.62%)
FFL 16.70 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.46%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.95%)
LOTCHEM 29.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.01%)
MLCF 94.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.09%)
NBP 202.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.41%)
NCPL 57.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.26%)
NPL 67.78 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.7%)
OGDC 316.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.57%)
PACE 10.64 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 43.15 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (3.3%)
PIBTL 16.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PPL 220.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.15%)
PRL 49.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 70.98 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.39%)
SSGC 28.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-3.33%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.33%)
TELE 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TPL 18.14 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (5.65%)
TPLP 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (7.11%)
TREET 22.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 60.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.13%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has directed Member Operations Inland Revenue, Federal Board of Revenue, to ensure the presence of Chief Sales Tax Operations before the Adviser to FTO on 16-Sept-2025, in connection with wilful defiance of an unchallenged order passed by the FTO.

When contacted, tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt told Business Recorder that a “new novel mode” has been adopted by some officers within FBR whenever the issue involves returning taxpayers’ money in the form of refunds.

Waheed pointed out that the Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court has already delineated the jurisdiction of the FTO to initiate contempt proceedings under Section 16 of the FTO Ordinance, 2000, in W.P. No. 1238/2013.

The court held that the pivotal question was whether, under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court could interfere with or set aside the action of the FTO initiated under Section 16 of the FTO Ordinance. The court categorically ruled that it could not interfere, since the FTO enjoys mutatis mutandis, the same powers as the Supreme Court in punishing contempt.

The power being exercised by the FTO is parallel to the powers of Apex Court, and against such action, a statutory right of appeal lies directly before the Supreme Court under section 16(2) of the Ordinance, Waheed elaborated.

The tax lawyer emphasised that the FTO must move ahead with contempt proceedings against FBR officers involved in delaying payment of refunds.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.