BR100 Decreased By (-1.39%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.72%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-1.3%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.25%)
AGHA 7.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.1%)
BECO 5.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.33%)
BML 59.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.22%)
BOP 33.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.49%)
CNERGY 9.81 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.98%)
CSIL 5.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.45%)
FCCL 53.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.16%)
FFL 16.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.95%)
FNEL 1.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.63%)
KEL 7.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.16%)
KOSM 5.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.23%)
LOTCHEM 29.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-4.34%)
MLCF 95.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.66 (-2.71%)
NBP 204.35 Decreased By ▼ -4.44 (-2.13%)
NCPL 58.24 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-2.3%)
NPL 67.79 Decreased By ▼ -2.08 (-2.98%)
OGDC 317.94 Decreased By ▼ -5.42 (-1.68%)
PACE 10.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.25%)
PAEL 41.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.99%)
PIBTL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.9%)
PPL 219.74 Decreased By ▼ -4.99 (-2.22%)
PRL 44.59 Increased By ▲ 2.94 (7.06%)
PTC 70.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.49%)
SSGC 28.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.3%)
TBL 9.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.2%)
TELE 8.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.56%)
TPL 16.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.42%)
TPLP 12.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-5.25%)
TREET 22.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.13%)
TRG 60.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.69%)
BR Research

MLCF: Slow ascent

Published Updated

In just three years, Mapleleaf Cement (PSX: MLCF) has watched its revenues double, though most of this growth came in FY22 and FY23. This fiscal year, revenues grew only 7 percent, in fact, saved only by improved retention prices, and not volumes. In 9M, dispatches dropped 5 percent, though exports grew 30 percent.

The company has always had a strong presence in exporting markets across borders and it seems growing exports have continued unabated even when local markets dried up with demand. Despite lower overall dispatches, the fiscal year did not pan out as bad, not only due to price hikes that facilitated the topline but also reduced costs. The company spent energy focusing on coal supplies domestically and was able to optimize its coal costs by managing its inventory well. The company has also been taking cost-cutting initiatives by using alternative fuels and power sources (coal-fired power plant run by its subsidiary Mapleleaf Power, solar, and waste heat recovery) and switching to more affordable packing materials all to trim the fat. This helped FY24 to improve on margins, landing at 32 percent from last year’s 29 percent.

However, overheads and finance costs had the company beat. In FY24, overheads as a share of revenue grew to 11 percent from 8 percent while finance costs—ballooned by peak interest rates and credit against MLCF’s new production line—grew to 6 percent from 4 percent. Together the expenditure grew to 17 percent of revenue which is substantial in and of itself, but also in comparison to last year’s 12 percent. As a result, before-tax profits declined 3 percent. The lower incidence of income tax compared to last year brought the ultimate earnings up by 17 percent year on year. The company ended the year on a good note considering the challenges that demand brought to nearly all cement companies in the same boat. What set Mapleleaf apart may be its growing control over its costs, especially its reduced reliance on the grid which remains susceptible to steep tariff hikes as the myriad of issues faced by the power sector come to a head. Mapleleaf may not be a mover and shaker in the cement business and has a long way to climb up to the top, but it is not laying low either, eager to make investments into the business.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.