BR100 Decreased By (-0.06%)
BR30 Increased By (1.22%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.07%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.47%)
AGHA 7.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.65%)
BECO 5.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.95%)
BML 60.22 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.35%)
BOP 35.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-3.24%)
CNERGY 13.13 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (9.97%)
CSIL 6.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.97%)
FCCL 57.97 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.06%)
FFL 16.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.97%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.48 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.19%)
KOSM 6.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
LOTCHEM 27.75 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (2.25%)
MLCF 102.98 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (0.89%)
NBP 206.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.15%)
NCPL 62.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.61%)
NPL 71.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.96%)
OGDC 323.78 Increased By ▲ 4.59 (1.44%)
PACE 11.51 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.14%)
PAEL 43.90 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.05%)
PIBTL 16.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.95%)
PPL 229.47 Increased By ▲ 7.92 (3.57%)
PRL 70.11 Increased By ▲ 6.36 (9.98%)
PTC 72.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.36%)
SSGC 27.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.62%)
TBL 9.86 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.72 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.16%)
TPL 22.62 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (9.38%)
TPLP 15.68 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (4.67%)
TREET 24.21 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.46%)
TRG 61.13 Decreased By ▼ -2.16 (-3.41%)
Editorials Print edition: 2024-07-20

Moody’s says it right

Published Updated

EDITORIAL: Finally, it’s taken a key ratings agency to turn the spotlight towards some, by no means all, of the pitfalls on the long road that is the new EFF (Extended Fund Facility).

Moody’s doesn’t doubt that the SLA (Staff-Level Agreement) reached with the IMF will be green-lighted by its executive board, and appreciates that it will “improve Pakistan’s funding prospects”, yet warns that the harsh “upfront conditions” might demand more muscle than a weak government can show; hence pouring cold water over the euphoria of the last few days.

Moody’s makes a very valid point. It doesn’t mention that the government just decided not to create crucial extra fiscal space by taxing the biggest, most protected holy cows, which means the increased burden will fall squarely on the middle- and lower-income groups.

But it does say that those “upfront conditions” – especially structural reforms – will grow harder as the Facility rolls on, and questions whether a fragile coalition government, still struggling for legitimacy months after a very disputed election result, will be able to force them on people already hurting from record inflation and unemployment of the last three years.

Social tensions – which are sure to arise, perhaps even rioting – could well force a rollback of the programme midway; as has happened so, so often in our long history with the Fund. Where would we stand then?

According to the IMF itself, Pakistan’s external financing needs are $21 billion for this fiscal and another $23 billion for 2025-26, while reserves are only $9.4 billion as of now.

These repayments will roll over only and only if we’re on an active IMF programme. If it is cut short – because of social unrest or weak revenue collection (because of the deliberately skewed tax regime) – then the country will most certainly default. It’s as simple as that.

Interestingly, the report seems to have ignored the insurgency that is building and its own steep cost.

Foreign investors and bi- and multi-lateral creditors will offer their sympathies, but not their investments, as people die and insecurity to life and limb persists and risk of their money being sucked into another war-on-terror black hole increases.

So, the only question that really matters right now is whether the government can cajole the people into enduring unprecedented and discriminatory tax misery – largely because it still wants to protect the big sectors with the contacts and connections to stay out of the tax net – long enough for the EFF to run its course and delay default that much longer.

Moody’s, for one, does not seem very optimistic. Neither would millions upon millions of people be when the taxman inflates bills beyond their entire incomes. That is when the government will have to prove its mettle.

How it juggles the economy, the insurgency, and perhaps the most bitter political divide in the country’s history will come into very sharp focus very soon.

So far, its non-seriousness about equitable taxation and inaction on the SOE (state-owned enterprise) front shows, if anything, is that it does not even fully understand the gravity of the situation.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Aamir Jul 20, 2024 06:26am
It's not about further taxation but about govt and defense expenditures reduction, privatization, population control and education and good governance. Not about taxing a dead economy
0
M. Zahid Iftikhar Jul 20, 2024 10:45am
PML-N is rightly criticised, but not a word about a party that starts with a P, has a T in the middle & ends in I. It sees forcing default as an electoral strategy & has tried very hard TWICE already.
0
KU Jul 20, 2024 11:13am
The only truth is that they don't care about the gravity of situation n want advantage in chaos. “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.” – Mark Twain
0
Builder Jul 20, 2024 10:33pm
We failed on population control despite a ton of US and UN programs. The focus should have been education but unfortunately, it had the lowest priority. Consequences for entire nation!
0