BR100 Increased By (0.11%)
BR30 Increased By (0.49%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.31%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.33%)
AGHA 6.39 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.11%)
BECO 4.36 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.11%)
BML 62.72 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.43%)
BOP 31.38 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.48%)
CNERGY 11.72 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.12%)
CSIL 5.93 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.67%)
FCCL 61.70 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.26%)
FFL 14.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.07%)
FNEL 1.26 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.44%)
KEL 6.33 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.12%)
KOSM 5.88 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (5.76%)
LOTCHEM 24.70 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.08%)
MLCF 104.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.08%)
NBP 173.06 Decreased By ▼ -2.22 (-1.27%)
NCPL 51.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-2.05%)
NPL 54.18 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)
OGDC 316.24 Increased By ▲ 2.85 (0.91%)
PACE 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.22%)
PAEL 35.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.67%)
PIBTL 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
PPL 226.73 Increased By ▲ 4.92 (2.22%)
PRL 80.15 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (1.35%)
PTC 46.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.53%)
SSGC 23.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
TBL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.62 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.11%)
TPL 24.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-2.23%)
TPLP 13.00 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (3.92%)
TREET 26.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.95%)
TRG 53.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.22%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday sought a reply from the chancellor Punjab University (PU) on a petition of Professor Dr Shabir Sarwar within a week challenging the appointment of ‘influential’ candidates as professor of the School of Communication Studies (SCS) of the PU.

The court also directed a provincial law officer to submit the decision by the chancellor on a representation made by the petitioner Associate Professor.

Earlier, petitioner’s counsel told the court that the chancellor had not submitted his reply since 2022 when the petition was filed. He said a representation filed by the petitioner was still pending with the chancellor.

The petition challenged the appointment of Dr Sawera Shami, Dr Mian Hannan and Dr Lubna Zaheer.

The petitioner alleged favouritism, misuse of authority, violation of rules and regulations in the selection process.

He said the meeting to recommend the names of the panel of foreign experts/referees was never convened in violation of university rules and regulations.

He asked the court to set aside the impugned appointments for being made in an illegal manner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.