BR100 Increased By (0.02%)
BR30 Increased By (0.06%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.05%)
BECO 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.36%)
BML 56.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.68%)
BOP 35.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.61%)
DCL 11.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
FCCL 56.61 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.21%)
FCSC 5.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.13%)
FFL 17.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.61%)
FNEL 1.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
KEL 8.39 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.32%)
KOSM 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.6%)
MLCF 101.06 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.3%)
NBP 202.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.28%)
PACE 11.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.61%)
PAEL 43.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.56%)
PIAHCLA 27.24 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.89%)
PIBTL 17.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.11%)
PPL 244.79 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (0.89%)
PRL 35.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.45%)
PTC 65.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.61%)
SEARL 93.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.03%)
SSGC 32.98 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.33%)
TELE 9.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.77%)
THCCL 66.80 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.47%)
TPLP 10.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.91%)
TREET 25.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.93%)
TRG 65.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.08%)
WAVES 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has declared that the advisors in the FTO Office follow professional conduct with devotion, objectivity, and an unbiased approach while deciding cases.

In the latest order issued in the case of IESCO, the FTO held that there is no order on record by any Court/Tribunal establishing that the Large Tax Office (LTO) resorted to coercive action for the recovery of tax through illegal notice under section 48 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

In an application before the FTO it was contested that the sales tax adviser of the FTO Office has ignored/skipped the root cause of the complaint despite (mechanically) recording crux of the matter in the order. The arguments also recorded in note sheets (not provided despite repeated requests) and binding verdicts provided have been disregarded for some unknown reasons.

The FTO order states, allegation that the advisor while examining the case and preparing draft recommendations intentionally misread or not read evidence and binding verdicts of the superior judiciary with a view to protect “some rogue elements working in the FBR, who happen to be past time friends,” suffice it say that the advisors in FTO Office follow professional conduct with devotion, objectivity and unbiased approach.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.