England won by zero runs and New Zealand loss by zero runs, which was the case on Sunday after the hosts England claimed their maiden ICC World Cup trophy at Lords. Despite being one of the finest finale cricket has ever produced, the match was not without its controversies as fans questioned the International Cricket Council (ICC) rules, and were of the view that the World Cup title should have been awarded to both teams rather than England, as no team was able to outdo each other on the number of runs. Teacher: England is first NZ: but I had the same marks. Teacher: But see he answered a 4-mark question, and u answered two 2-mark questions. So, he's the winner. NZ: What the... #ICCRules — Chetan Bhagat (@chetan_bhagat) 15 July 2019 This World Cup should have been shared. If England got more boundaries. New Zealand took more wickets. So the criteria is absurd. All 22 of those boys gave their everything and no one was lesser. Then why do only 11 get to feel like they were the best. — Er.Aditya arya (@Adityaaryabihar) 15 July 2019 We won't see such a final again. #ICCRules your rules are so bad. Joint winners would have made cricket noble. — sayeed ahmed (@lysosoma) 15 July 2019 ICC rules still need lots of improvements. Umpiring has been average in this World Cup, needs to be more automated. Weathers conditions of the host country should be well analyzed. Number of reviews should be increased. Umpires calls concept should be removed. — Ranjeet 🇮🇳 (@rannjeeet) 15 July 2019 Final World Cup tweet. Please remember that Strauss had a huge influence over this teams win yesterday. Him and Eoin paved the way to play this aggressive brand and also back the players in failure. They talked the talk & walked the walk! Glory be to cricket in the UK! 🏴🏆 — Kevin Pietersen🦏 (@KP24) 15 July 2019 England hos not won the match by themselves it's the #ICCRules which made them win !!! Such a ridiculous rule of counting fours !! @ICC you are ruining the game the spirit with such stupid rule's ! — Rohhan Patel (@rohhan90) 15 July 2019 48 matches, 46 days, and the winner is decided by number of boundaries 😆😆 Senseless. . #ICCrules.. 🏆 — Syed Arsalan (@SyedArs33364238) 14 July 2019 Could it be decided by the no of wickets lost? Would that reduce flair and risk-taking? Could it be decided by no of runs minus extras? Does that paper over some deficiencies? Should a cricket match have joint winners if a super over is tied? — Harsha Bhogle (@bhogleharsha) 15 July 2019