AIRLINK 80.60 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (1.5%)
BOP 5.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 4.52 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.2%)
DFML 34.50 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.95%)
DGKC 78.90 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (2.64%)
FCCL 20.85 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.56%)
FFBL 33.78 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (7.58%)
FFL 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.52%)
GGL 10.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.37%)
HBL 117.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.07%)
HUBC 137.80 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (2.76%)
HUMNL 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.71%)
KEL 4.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.71%)
KOSM 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.8%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.96%)
OGDC 137.20 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.37%)
PAEL 22.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.51%)
PIAA 26.57 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.08%)
PIBTL 6.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.43%)
PPL 114.30 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.48%)
PRL 27.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.69%)
PTC 14.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.08%)
SEARL 57.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.35%)
SNGP 66.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.11%)
SSGC 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
TELE 9.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.3%)
TPLP 11.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.87%)
TRG 70.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.59%)
UNITY 25.20 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.53%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-5%)
BR100 7,629 Increased By 103 (1.37%)
BR30 24,842 Increased By 192.5 (0.78%)
KSE100 72,743 Increased By 771.4 (1.07%)
KSE30 24,034 Increased By 284.8 (1.2%)

imageLAHORE: A Lahore High Court division bench on Monday stayed recovery of Universal Obligation Fund Surcharge (UOFS), Debt Servicing Surcharge (DSS) and Neelam-Jhelum surcharge (NJS) in electricity bills to the extent of Punjab province after suspending their notifications.

The division bench headed by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah passed the orders on a petition filed by Judicial Activism Panel and Muhammad Azhar Siddique against imposition of said surcharges.

Earlier, petitioner Muhammad Azhar Siddique arguing before the court that the federal government was authorised to impose surcharge under Section 31(5) of the Electricity Act 1997 but these powers were granted under Finance Act 2008.

He contended that the section 31(5) of the act was ultra vires of the Constitution as surcharge was not a tax and said section was added through finance bill. "no amendment could be made through finance bill to impose a surcharge ", he added. He contended that it was also a violation of fundamental rights especially Articles 9, 14,18,23,24, 37 and 38 of the Constitution.

The petitioner pleaded the court to set aside the said surcharges after declaring them ultra vires of the Constitution.

He also pleaded the bench to stop the recovery of said surcharges after suspending notifications of October 3 and November 1 for their implementation.

The bench after recording initial arguments stopped the recovery of surcharges and sought a reply from Government and NEPRA till January 13.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.