AIRLINK 79.41 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (1.3%)
BOP 5.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
CNERGY 4.38 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
DFML 33.19 Increased By ▲ 2.32 (7.52%)
DGKC 76.87 Decreased By ▼ -1.64 (-2.09%)
FCCL 20.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.24%)
FFBL 31.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.79%)
FFL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.62%)
GGL 10.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.39%)
HBL 117.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.48%)
HUBC 134.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-0.74%)
HUMNL 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.89%)
KEL 4.67 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (11.99%)
KOSM 4.74 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
MLCF 37.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-3.18%)
OGDC 136.70 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (1.37%)
PAEL 23.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.07%)
PIAA 26.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.34%)
PIBTL 7.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.28%)
PPL 113.75 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.26%)
PRL 27.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.76%)
PTC 14.75 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.03%)
SEARL 57.20 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.24%)
SNGP 67.50 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.81%)
SSGC 11.09 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.37%)
TELE 9.23 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.87%)
TPLP 11.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.94%)
TRG 72.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.94%)
UNITY 24.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.26%)
WTL 1.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.26%)
BR100 7,526 Increased By 32.9 (0.44%)
BR30 24,650 Increased By 91.4 (0.37%)
KSE100 71,971 Decreased By -80.5 (-0.11%)
KSE30 23,749 Decreased By -58.8 (-0.25%)

 Fitch Ratings has today said, in a just published report, that the outlook for Indian textile companies is stable for 2011, on the back of robust domestic demand, sluggish-yet-steadily-growing export demand and an overall improvement in their credit profiles (i.e. lower gearing and leverage). However, Fitch's outlook for Indian garment exporters is negative to stable, as they continue to face challenges of rupee appreciation against the USD. The agency expects volume gains to be partly offset due to lower rupee revenues, leading to low-to-moderate single-digit export revenue growth for garment exporters in 2011.

The agency expects the domestic apparel market to remain strong, boosted by a higher purchasing power and a greater penetration of the organised retail and favourable demographics.

The growing front-end demand will filter through to downstream players, e.g. garmenters, fabric makers, spinners and traders. In contrast, despite improving demand in key export markets, rupee appreciation and rising input costs have impaired the competitive advantage of Indian garment exporters on the global front. Fitch expects cotton and cotton yarn prices to remain firm in the current cotton season (October 2010 to September 2011). For more information, please refer to the commentary, entitled "Fitch: Rising Cotton Prices  Adverse Impact on Cotton Textiles", dated 15 December 2010 and available at www.fitchratings.com. Also, there is an uptrend in synthetic fibre and yarn prices, which is bolstered by the supply-demand gap (rising substitution for highly prices cotton) and in sync with higher input prices (which are crude derivatives).

Profitability pressures will likely filter down the value chain to cotton textile companies, depending on their positioning in the value chain, level of integration, timing of cotton buying and diversification into synthetic and other natural fibres. Spinners' margins are expected to remain protected to a greater extent as robust demand for yarn has enabled them to pass on price hikes; fabric makers and garmenters are less able to do so. Capex activity will be stronger in 2011 than the last twO years', driven by continued government support under the technology upgradation fund scheme and growing demand, which will motivate capacity expansion. Debt-funded capex will pressurise the credit metrics of the textile companies in the medium-term.

Downside risks to the outlook could stem from a double-dip recession in key export markets, competition aggravated by a sharper rupee appreciation and adverse changes in regulation (impacting raw materials or end-product prices). A positive outlook is unforeseeable against a backdrop of volatile input prices, uncertainty on yarn prices and competition restraining pricing power.

COPYRIGHT REUTERS, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.