BR100 Increased By (0.57%)
BR30 Increased By (0.87%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.78%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.52%)
AGHA 7.48 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.54%)
BECO 5.42 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.69%)
BML 57.74 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.28%)
BOP 33.57 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.54%)
CNERGY 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.32%)
CSIL 6.12 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (12.92%)
FCCL 54.67 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.13%)
FFL 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (4.17%)
KEL 7.22 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.42%)
KOSM 5.99 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
LOTCHEM 27.27 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.52%)
MLCF 96.40 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (0.85%)
NBP 202.00 Increased By ▲ 1.74 (0.87%)
NCPL 56.04 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.65%)
NPL 66.30 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.68%)
OGDC 315.80 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (0.57%)
PACE 10.51 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
PAEL 42.85 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (1.73%)
PIBTL 17.16 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.88%)
PPL 216.85 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (0.79%)
PRL 59.26 Increased By ▲ 2.63 (4.64%)
PTC 72.40 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (1.43%)
SSGC 25.38 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.79%)
TBL 9.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.83%)
TELE 8.37 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.72%)
TPL 19.55 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.93%)
TPLP 12.80 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
TREET 23.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.3%)
TRG 61.94 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.23%)
Sports

Akhtar responds to Rizvi’s defamation lawsuit

Rizvi had sent Akhtar a notice after being branded an "inept" person by the fastest bowler ever in a YouTube video.
Published Updated
  • Rizvi had sent Akhtar a notice after being branded an "inept" person by the fastest bowler ever in a YouTube video.

Pakistan legend Shoaib Akhtar has responded to Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB)’s advisor Tafazzul Rizvi lawsuit by sending a legal notice informing him that the defamation against him was "defective/invalid".

Rizvi had sent Akhtar a notice after being branded an "inept" person by the fastest bowler ever in a YouTube video.

Former fast bowler had levelled a series of allegations in the video, accusing the PCB of providing cover to fixers and Rizvi of profiting by pitting players against the board.

The Rawalpindi Express, in his own legal retort sent through his attorney, stated that his analysis, "made in public interest", are a critique on the PCB's shortcomings and meant as "expression of opinion and not assertion of fact".

Akhtar branded Rizvi's notice "legally defective, meritless and misconceived" and demanded that he issue an apology for their attempt to "publicly humiliate, degrade, defame and ridicule" him.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.