The Economist attacks India in censorship row

The Economist magazine has accused India of hostile censorship after officials insisted that a map in the latest edition be covered up as it showed disputed borders in Kashmir. Customs officers ordered that 28,000 copies of the news weekly must have stickers placed over a diagram showing how control of Kashmir is split between India, Pakistan and China.
New Delhi imposes tight restrictions on all printed maps, insisting they show all of Kashmir as being part of India. "India is meant to be a democracy that approves of freedom of speech," John Micklethwait, editor-in-chief of The Economist, told AFP. "But they take a much more hostile attitude on this matter than either Pakistan or China."
He added: "This is an act of censorship, and many wise and sensible voices in India see it has no point." The map is used as an illustration for a front-page story on "The world's most dangerous border" between India and Pakistan. The Economist began distributing the edition on Tuesday with a blank white sticker covering the small map..
"We are just told 'it is the law of India'," Micklethwait said. "The map is impartial, accurate and fair. We show everyone's claims, and it is also realistic as it shows where the unofficial border actually falls." The magazine has clashed in the past with Indian authorities.
In December an entire issue was pulped on the censors' orders over a map of the region, and its publishers predicted the May 21 edition was likely to hit trouble. Offending maps in The Economist and other foreign publications are routinely targeted by the censors' office, which stamps each page stating that the borders as shown do not reflect India's claims.
"As a point of principle we are against changing our articles," said Micklethwait, speaking by telephone from London on Monday. "So we mentioned the problem in a piece pointing out how touchy India is on this." The magazine also printed a warning on one page saying the map was likely to be censored. "Unlike their government, we think our Indian readers can face political reality," it said.
Sham Lal, a senior official in India's ministry of information and broadcasting, declined to comment on Micklethwait's remarks. "We have no knowledge and no comments to make on this matter," he told AFP. Wilson John, a Pakistan expert at the Observer Research Foundation think-tank in New Delhi, said that the map was seen as a national security issue by the Indian government.
"This is about sovereignty," he said. "I'm not surprised as this behaviour is an accepted norm in India. "Mapping in this region has been an issue for many decades and, because the territorial dispute is far from resolved, maps will remain a problem." He added India was generally proud of having a free press but that Kashmir "always creates sensitivities that have to be kept in mind". Micklethwait said India was now an increasingly modern economic powerhouse with a growing number of Economist readers. "Other publications have had the same problems, but perhaps we have been more in their face," he said.