AIRLINK 74.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.47%)
BOP 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.75%)
CNERGY 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.78%)
DFML 35.84 Increased By ▲ 2.84 (8.61%)
DGKC 88.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.01%)
FCCL 22.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.55%)
FFBL 32.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
FFL 9.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
GGL 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.74%)
HBL 115.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.51%)
HUBC 135.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 9.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.3%)
KEL 4.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.43%)
KOSM 4.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.85%)
MLCF 39.88 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
OGDC 137.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-0.76%)
PAEL 26.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.71%)
PIAA 26.28 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (4.49%)
PIBTL 6.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.17%)
PPL 122.90 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.13%)
PRL 26.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.18%)
PTC 14.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 58.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.29%)
SNGP 70.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.05%)
SSGC 10.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.77%)
TELE 8.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.04%)
TPLP 11.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.13%)
TRG 64.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.38%)
UNITY 26.05 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.97%)
WTL 1.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.13%)
BR100 7,838 Increased By 19.2 (0.24%)
BR30 25,460 Decreased By -117.2 (-0.46%)
KSE100 74,931 Increased By 266.7 (0.36%)
KSE30 24,146 Increased By 74.2 (0.31%)

imageWASHINGTON: A US federal appeals court delivered a stinging and potentially crippling blow to President Barack Obama's health care law Tuesday, ruling that insurance subsidies may not be available to millions of users.

In a judgment it said has "major consequences," the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Obama administration cannot subsidize Americans who purchased their coverage through a government website, and that tax credits established under the 2010 law can only be issued to residents of states that set up their own so-called exchanges for buying insurance.

The law unambiguously "limits the availability of premium tax credits to state-established exchanges," two of the panel's judges wrote in a 72-page ruling.

The decision could severely hamper the law's mandate of bringing affordable health care to millions of Americans.

The decision impacts 27 states where predominantly Republican governors or state houses are opposed to so-called Obamacare, and another nine states that have partially opted out.

The ruling stated that the law "plainly distinguishes exchanges established by states from those established by the federal government," the judges wrote.

"At least until states that wish to can set up exchanges, our ruling will likely have significant consequences, both for the millions of individuals receiving tax credits through federal exchanges and for health insurance markets more broadly."

The Obama administration immediately called for a review of the decision. The case may eventually be decided by the US Supreme Court, which has already ruled in favour of the constitutionality of another part of the law in 2012.

"We believe that this decision is incorrect, inconsistent with congressional intent, different from previous rulings, and at odds with the goal of the law: to make health care affordable no matter where people live," Department of Justice spokeswoman Emily Pierce said.

She stressed that for now, the tax subsidies which can dramatically reduce insurance costs for low income families or individuals remain intact and available across the country.

But House Speaker John Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, hailed the verdict as a victory over White House executive overreach.

"For the second time in a month, the courts have ruled against the president's unilateral actions regarding Obamacare."

The Supreme Court struck a severe blow to the Affordable Care Act last month when it ruled that some for-profit companies could opt out of offering contraceptive coverage on religious grounds.

"Today's ruling is also further proof that President Obama's health care law is completely unworkable. It cannot be fixed."

Republicans have introduced dozens of bills in recent years aimed at repealing or defunding Obamacare. None has become law.

Comments

Comments are closed.