BR100 Increased By (0.12%)
BR30 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.26%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.26%)
AGHA 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.53%)
BECO 5.57 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.09%)
BML 59.74 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.12%)
BOP 34.40 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.85%)
CNERGY 13.11 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.1%)
CSIL 6.41 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (5.08%)
FCCL 58.06 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.69%)
FFL 16.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.19%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.67%)
KOSM 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.52%)
LOTCHEM 27.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.14%)
MLCF 102.75 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (2.09%)
NBP 205.06 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (0.64%)
NCPL 59.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.55%)
NPL 68.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2%)
OGDC 318.92 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-0.43%)
PACE 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.45%)
PAEL 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.05%)
PIBTL 16.63 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
PPL 229.45 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.27%)
PRL 70.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.31%)
PTC 71.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.91%)
SSGC 27.41 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (2.74%)
TBL 10.31 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (5.1%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.93%)
TPL 23.06 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (3.69%)
TPLP 15.76 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (4.3%)
TREET 24.71 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.4%)
TRG 60.29 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.75%)
Print Print edition: 2011-12-11

PTA conducts QoS survey of 'IR' facility

Published Updated

Regulators actively monitor quality of service (QoS) of operators to safeguard consumers' interests. Pakistan Telecom Authority (PTA) also regularly conducts QoS survey of different services offered by its licensees, but it is pertinent to mention here that PTA is the first known regulator in the world which has conducted a survey in order to check the QoS of 'International Roaming' (IR) facility.
The first survey was conducted in 2006, followed by the second phase in 2009, to figure IR QoS parameters and their benchmarking. On the basis of the actual test results, recommendations of standardising bodies--GSMA, ITU, etc-- and best international practices, following standards were developed to measure IR QoS (Table-1).



==============================================================
Sr.No Parameter Reference Value
==============================================================
1 Call Completion ratio (CCR) 80%
2. Call Setup Time (CST) 16.5 seconds
3. Mean Opinion score (MoS) 3
4. End to End call delay (E2E) Preferred 150 msec
Up Limit 400 msec
5. Received Caller Line Identification (R-CLI) 99%
6. SMS Success rate (SSR) 95%
7. SMS End 2 End duration (SMS E2E) Upper limit 90 sec
==============================================================
Table-1 IR QoS Parameters.
==============================================================

The test results of all the five cellular operators as per above mentioned IR QoS parameters are shown in Figure-1. None of the operator met all the QoS criteria. However, Mobilink showed better results compared to other four operators. The performance of Telenor, Ufone & Zong were similar to each other.
The compromising results of the survey pushed the regulator to move ahead by development of KPIs (mentioned in Table-2) for inclusion in Service Level Agreement (SLA) between LDIs & CMTOs.



==================================================================
Sr.No Parameter Reference Value
==================================================================
1. Call Setup Time (CST) 15 seconds
2. Mean Opinion score (MoS) >4
3. End to End delay (E2E) 300 millisecond
4. Received Caller Line Identification (R-CLI) >99%
5. Network Efficiency Ratio (NER) >99%
6. Average Call duration (ACD) Monthly basis
7. SMS Success rate (SSR) 99.9%
==================================================================
Table-2 KPIs List for inclusion in SLAs
==================================================================

The essential parameters for IR billing format were also finalised, and a survey was carried out in mid-2011 to check the billing discrepancies (results of survey mentioned in Table-3). Mobilink and Telenor met all billing requirements successfully.
Despite difficulties faced by operators due to power cuts (blackout/brownout), rising cost of fossil energy, the cellular operators have been trying to maintain services at affordable cost. The regulator is of the opinion that due to lowering of 'Access Promotion Contribution' (APC) and a little more effort in retaining the customer, cellular operators will succeed in meeting the criteria shown at Table-1 and appropriate billing format as shown in Table-3.



===========================================================================
Parameter Mobilink Telenor Ufone Warid Zong
===========================================================================
Date ü ü ü ü ü
Time (sec) ü ü ü ü ü
Number (destination) ü ü ü X ü
Call duration (hh:mm:sec) ü ü X ü ü
Location (Operator, Country) ü ü X X X
IR Traffic i/c, o/g ü ü ü ü ü
Summary Page
(Account history,
service details) ü ü ü ü ü
===========================================================================

-PR
Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.