BR100 Increased By (0.12%)
BR30 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.26%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.26%)
AGHA 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.53%)
BECO 5.57 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.09%)
BML 59.74 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.12%)
BOP 34.40 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.85%)
CNERGY 13.11 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.1%)
CSIL 6.41 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (5.08%)
FCCL 58.06 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.69%)
FFL 16.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.19%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.67%)
KOSM 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.52%)
LOTCHEM 27.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.14%)
MLCF 102.75 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (2.09%)
NBP 205.06 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (0.64%)
NCPL 59.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.55%)
NPL 68.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2%)
OGDC 318.92 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-0.43%)
PACE 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.45%)
PAEL 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.05%)
PIBTL 16.63 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
PPL 229.45 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.27%)
PRL 70.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.31%)
PTC 71.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.91%)
SSGC 27.41 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (2.74%)
TBL 10.31 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (5.1%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.93%)
TPL 23.06 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (3.69%)
TPLP 15.76 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (4.3%)
TREET 24.71 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.4%)
TRG 60.29 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.75%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has issued show cause notice to M/s Engro Vopak Terminal Limited (EVTL) for prima facie abusing its dominant position by imposing unfair trading conditions and also employing constructive refusal to deal strategy with its customer in violation of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2010.
According to a press release issued on Monday, a formal complaint was lodged to CCP by M/s Lotte Pakistan PPTA Limited (Lotte Pakistan) against EVTL. In its Complaint, Lotte Pakistan has alleged that EVTL is abusing its dominant position by charging exorbitant price for its handling and storage facilities and services.
The CCP conducted a comprehensive inquiry in the matter, which revealed that the EVTL has been granted exclusive rights for thirty years to handle and store all liquid chemicals entering the Port Qasim area through a concession agreement between EVTL and Port Qasim Authority.
EVTL has also entered into a Storage Agreement with Lotte Pakistan to provide handling and storage facilities for Reception Storage and Delivery of Paraxylene and Acetic Acid. By virtue of its monopoly, EVTL appears to have been able to dictate its own terms and conditions to its customer.
In terms of Enquiry Report, EVTL is charging exorbitant rate of tariff and has recovered $133 million from its customer, Lotte Pakistan, which amount is much more than the purported capital cost and even the total investment made to-date in terminal infrastructure.
In the Financial Model submitted to PQA at the time of grant of concession, EVTL has provided the tariff structure to yield 18 percent IRR based on Capital cost for required handling and storage, Nature of the product, Related operating cost and Product throughput and parcel size. However, the tariff structure given in Storage Agreement between the customer ie Lotte Pakistan and EVTL fails to reflect any aforementioned basis and consequently IRR% remains unascertained. On the other hand customer has no other readily available option in the relevant market to avail handling and storage. After conducting an Enquiry the findings affirm that rent seeking from a captured customer has, Prima facie, resulted into abuse of dominance by EVTL in form of imposing unfair trading conditions on the customer, thereby, violating Section 3(3)(a) of the Act.
The Storage Agreement is going to expire in 2012. Both parties have entered into negotiations for its renewal as per their contractual terms. The Complainant, Lotte Pakistan, has alleged that EVTL after having recovered the capital cost and even total investment in the project from Lotte Pakistan, EVTL is still demanding an exorbitant rate of tariff. As per the findings of the Enquiry Report such conduct of EVTL, prima facie, amounts to a constructive refusal to deal with its customer in contravention of Section 3(3)(h) of the Act.
The CCP has already issued Show Cause Notices to EVTL and Port Qasim Authority for failure to seek exemption for the concessions agreement entered into between both parties which is a, prima facie, prohibited agreement within the ambit of Section 4 of Act. As two different violations under the Act have occurred in respect of same subject matter of concession agreement and also involve the same parties, the CCP may decide to consolidate the hearings in both matters.-PR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.