BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)

The continuous hearing of contempt of court issue against a number of dysfunctional and retired judges of superior judiciary, who took oath under the annulled Provisional Constitutional Order of November 3, 2007, on Monday was marked with contentions between the counsel and Supreme Court bench members.
Raja Ibrahim Satti, counsel for former justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, who also served as Chief Justice of Pakistan, apparently dissatisfied with bench's ruling over his client's plea, appealed to the court to defer proceedings on the issue as he wanted to file a review on rejection of his earlier civil miscellaneous appeal.
The four-member bench comprising Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, Justice Jawwad S. Khawja, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain and Justice Tariq Parvez resumed the hearing of the pending issue. Satti said he wanted to file a review over Monday's ruling and then would proceed to argue the case. He contended that the bench should first decide whether the show cause notices on contempt of court matter were issued under Contempt of Court Act 1976 or the amended law of 2006. The bench asked him that it was up to him to argue. Dr Abdul Basit, another counsel, when asked by the bench said that he would take four days to conclude his arguments.
He said that Satti had raised a valid point, which should be settled first and then he would argue. He questioned why the court was in such a haste, which would amount to giving a wrong impression in public who were watching it. Justice Jawwad S Khawja replied that they were before public and every person had the right to form an opinion.
He said that Satti had the right to file review as they had not stopped him from reviewing and arguing the case. Dr Basit said that with such approach the legal requirements would not be met. Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, who is heading the bench, observed that for the past two months, they had been hearing the case and the counsel were not settling the basic points involved in it. The bench would resume hearing on Tuesday.

Copyright Associated Press of Pakistan, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.