AIRLINK 72.18 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.68%)
BOP 4.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.4%)
CNERGY 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
DFML 28.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.21%)
DGKC 81.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.33%)
FCCL 21.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-2.05%)
FFBL 33.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-3.22%)
FFL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.18%)
GGL 10.48 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.56%)
HBL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.88%)
HUBC 140.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.36%)
HUMNL 9.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.45%)
KEL 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.99%)
KOSM 4.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.67%)
MLCF 37.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.95%)
OGDC 133.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.74%)
PAEL 25.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-3.83%)
PIAA 23.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-5.59%)
PIBTL 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.07%)
PPL 122.62 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.55%)
PRL 27.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-2.38%)
PTC 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.45%)
SEARL 56.62 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (3.15%)
SNGP 69.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.66%)
SSGC 10.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.58%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.28 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.01%)
TRG 61.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.51%)
UNITY 25.33 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.44%)
WTL 1.50 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (17.19%)
BR100 7,630 Decreased By -8.3 (-0.11%)
BR30 24,990 Increased By 18.4 (0.07%)
KSE100 72,602 Decreased By -159.4 (-0.22%)
KSE30 23,539 Decreased By -86.6 (-0.37%)

NEW YORK: Intel and ARM Holdings are on a collision course that may bloody investors. Intel dominates the markets for making processors for PCs and servers. Britain's ARM Holdings-powered chips run nearly all mobile phones and tablets. Each craves the other's markets. The shift to mobile computing may give ARM a long-term edge. But one thing's for certain: cut-throat competition.

Intel boasts a $140 billion market cap and designs and makes about 80 percent of the processors used in PCs, according to IDC. ARM is less than a tenth as valuable, in part because it doesn't make chips itself. It licenses designs for its processors, which are used by most chipmakers. About 90 percent of all cellphones utilize them.

While Intel chips are fast, they use lots of power. That's fine for plugged-in devices, but when a gadget runs on a battery, its makers turn to ARM, whose simpler designs sip less electricity.

The riches up for grabs are tremendous. Intel's PC and server sales alone were about $44 billion last year. Meanwhile, more mobile devices were sold than PCs last year. Throw in the fact that winners often take everything in technology, and it's easy to see the rivalry surging. Intel wants to use its manufacturing prowess to make smaller, more efficient, mobile chips. ARM's chips are becoming more powerful.

The first meaningful skirmishes are in tablets, which need speed and power efficiency. For example, Microsoft's Windows 8 should hit the market this fall. While the company has a long alliance with Intel, its software will now also run on ARM chips.

The history of similar fights suggests it may take years for a winner to emerge. Engineers don't like designing products with a new standard unless the advantages are clear. And users are reluctant to switch because they are tied into existing software.

Yet the effects will be felt on the two firms' profit lines earlier, as they compete for work. ARM doesn't have much room for error, trading at 42 times estimated 2012 earnings. Intel is cheaper at less than 12 times earnings. But the firm spends billions to build and run plants that make its chips. So its 24 percent net margins are highly dependent on keeping its factories running full tilt. If its standard loses ground, a large chunk of its $140 billion market capitalization could be in jeopardy.

CONTEXT NEWS

- Microsoft's Windows 8 is tentatively scheduled for a release this fall. Tablets using Intel chips and those powered by ARM processors will be able to run the new operating system.

- While certain new programs for Windows 8 can run on both types of processors, the ARM-powered devices are not "backwards compatible" and will therefore not run older Microsoft applications.

COPYRIGHT REUTERS, 2012
 

Comments

Comments are closed.