AIRLINK 79.41 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (1.3%)
BOP 5.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
CNERGY 4.38 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
DFML 33.19 Increased By ▲ 2.32 (7.52%)
DGKC 76.87 Decreased By ▼ -1.64 (-2.09%)
FCCL 20.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.24%)
FFBL 31.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.79%)
FFL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.62%)
GGL 10.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.39%)
HBL 117.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.48%)
HUBC 134.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-0.74%)
HUMNL 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.89%)
KEL 4.67 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (11.99%)
KOSM 4.74 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
MLCF 37.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-3.18%)
OGDC 136.70 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (1.37%)
PAEL 23.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.07%)
PIAA 26.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.34%)
PIBTL 7.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.28%)
PPL 113.75 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.26%)
PRL 27.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.76%)
PTC 14.75 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.03%)
SEARL 57.20 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.24%)
SNGP 67.50 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.81%)
SSGC 11.09 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.37%)
TELE 9.23 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.87%)
TPLP 11.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.94%)
TRG 72.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.94%)
UNITY 24.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.26%)
WTL 1.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.26%)
BR100 7,506 Increased By 12.9 (0.17%)
BR30 24,683 Increased By 124.5 (0.51%)
KSE100 71,971 Decreased By -80.5 (-0.11%)
KSE30 23,749 Decreased By -58.8 (-0.25%)
BR Research

Relief for cotton: a loss for exports?

After witnessing highest ever monthly volume in Feb-20, cotton imports in April were down by 40 percent from its pea
Published May 15, 2020

After witnessing highest ever monthly volume in Feb-20, cotton imports in April were down by 40 percent from its peak two months ago. Two months into lockdown, this comes as little surprise as global textile demand has eviscerated in the aftermath of Covid-19; but have put a dent in predictions of highest ever import bill in 30 years.

Recall that Pakistan recorded its lowest ever cotton output in the outgoing season at 8.55 million bales, falling short of estimated domestic consumption of 14-16 million bales by nearly 50 percent. Varying estimates of import were put forth, given the low opening stock position with spinning mills. Although clarity had been established on poor crop outlook way back in Sep-19, imports did not begin to trickle until the second half of fiscal year due to steep custom duty on import till the completion of harvest in Jan-20.

Once the duty was lifted in second week of Jan-20 – a regular practice to protect local growers and ginners – imports picked up like a charm, evidenced by import of 1 million bales in 6 weeks till Feb-20. Market insiders placed forecast of imports for Mar-June at 0.8 – 1 million bales per month, confirmed by news flow from banking channels that large spinners had booked sizable forwards for import way back in Oct-19.

Now that the orders have been cancelled or delayed, it appears that floor may fall out in the remainder two months of the fiscal year. According to Karachi Cotton Association, trading was suspended for nearly a month beginning last week of March and has shown no sign of life ever since business resumed officially a fortnight ago. Spot price is holding ground at Rs8,760 per maund, quietly hoping for a reversal in fortune.

Meanwhile, international cotton prices are at their lowest for at least past 5 years and are showing no signs of changing gears any time soon. Six-month rolling average of Cotlook “A” index indicates that spot prices are having their longest bear run since 2015-16, when bumper crop in top producing countries took prices down to $1.56kg for more than a year. Cotton futures for May-21 (365 days) is trading at 61cts/lb, down by 15 percent from Dec-20, long before Covid-19 had become a threat to global economy.

Amidst all of this, a push for imposition of an intervention price for cotton by the federal cabinet is deeply surprising. The proposal, earlier rejected by ECC, had suggested allocation of Rs83 billion package for public procurement of seed cotton at Rs4,200per maund for the soon-to-begin sowing season. This would amount to procurement of 4.3million bales – more than 50 percent of cotton production in FY20 – and a larger governmental footprint in commodity operations than even wheat (in % terms).

At a time of depressed demand forecast, an intervention price set well-above international rate may help pique grower interest in the crop. But at what cost? Government role in procurement operations cannot reverse the slowdown in global textile value chain.

On the contrary, it will increase the price of domestic cotton for the spinning industry making textile products even more uncompetitive in the international market – unless the government decides to set the issue price at (or lower) than international market rate, in which case it will have to show willingness to take a steep blow to exchequer.

At a time when cotton futures are trading at a significant discount than their long-term average, both government and the industry should explore the possibility of removing custom duty permanently, hedging future price risk and booking long contracts. Instead, it appears that constituency politics will carry the day in federal cabinet. A victory for optics may prove a loss for commerce.

Comments

Comments are closed.