AIRLINK 68.20 Increased By ▲ 3.00 (4.6%)
BOP 5.62 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.9%)
CNERGY 4.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.44%)
DFML 25.71 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (4.85%)
DGKC 69.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-1.09%)
FCCL 20.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.18%)
FFBL 30.75 Increased By ▲ 1.64 (5.63%)
FFL 9.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.31%)
GGL 10.07 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.6%)
HBL 114.65 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.35%)
HUBC 130.61 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (1.17%)
HUMNL 6.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.68%)
KOSM 4.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.82%)
MLCF 36.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.08%)
OGDC 132.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.08%)
PAEL 22.56 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.09%)
PIAA 25.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.46%)
PIBTL 6.60 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 113.26 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.36%)
PRL 29.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.65%)
PTC 15.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.92%)
SEARL 57.42 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.68%)
SNGP 65.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.83%)
SSGC 10.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.64%)
TELE 8.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.48%)
TPLP 11.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.85%)
TRG 68.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.03%)
UNITY 23.50 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.43%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.17%)
BR100 7,353 Increased By 58 (0.79%)
BR30 23,991 Increased By 137 (0.57%)
KSE100 70,598 Increased By 308.2 (0.44%)
KSE30 23,245 Increased By 73.7 (0.32%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has conveyed to the fast moving consumer goods manufacturers that the companies in this sector need to pay special care while advertising of their products by truthfully demonstrating pricing, character, method or place of production and quality of their products and services.

According to an order of the CCP issued here on Tuesday, the CCP bench noted that in today's increasingly health-conscious environment, consumers are getting more attuned to the health related claims made by Fast Moving Consumer Goods, especially those marketed to children and parents.

Each year, the fast moving consumer goods manufacturers spend millions of rupees marketing their products to elderly, adults, youth, children and adolescents. By virtue of this order, the Commission, hereby deems it appropriate to highlight the importance of truthful advertising. The business undertakings involved in this sector need to pay special care that their advertising and promotional material, irrespective of the medium, must truthfully demonstrate the pricing, character, method or place of production, properties, suitability for use and quality of their products and services.

Complainant is a company registered under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017) having its registered office at Karachi. The Complainant is involved in the manufacturing of Personal Care, Food and Hygiene Products. Respondent is a company registered under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 and is principally engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of consumer household, antiseptic, and pharmaceutical products. Both the complainant and the respondent squarely fall within the purview of an 'undertaking' as provided under clause (q) of subsection (1) of Section 2 of the Act.

It was alleged in the complaint that the Respondent company is engaged in misleading, deceptive, unsubstantiated and unethical advertisement campaign with respect to its soap product. The upshot of the above discussion is that the Respondent has failed to substantiate the claims made in the advertisement for the said soap and in fact has resultantly engaged itself in deceptive marketing practices in violation of Section 10 (1) of the Competition Act.

The CCP concluded that it is established that the respondent company has engaged in deceptive marketing practices prohibited under Section 10(2) (a) & 10(2) (b) read with Section 10(1) of the Act. Further, the conduct of the Respondent cannot be taken leniently as the Respondent in the past has filed complaints against other undertakings for similar nature of claims and have also been show caused by the Commission for resorting to deceptive marketing practices. Hence, we are constrained to impose a penalty of Rs 30,000,000 on the Respondent company for violation of Section 10 of the Act.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.