AVN 64.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.32%)
BAFL 30.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 4.65 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
CNERGY 3.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.55%)
DFML 13.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.29%)
DGKC 42.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.95%)
EPCL 46.79 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (2.14%)
FCCL 11.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.7%)
FFL 5.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.93%)
FLYNG 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.86%)
GGL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.89%)
HUBC 63.88 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.92%)
HUMNL 5.77 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.35%)
KAPCO 27.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.18%)
KEL 2.18 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (2.35%)
LOTCHEM 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.91%)
MLCF 21.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.42%)
NETSOL 83.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-1.28%)
OGDC 88.31 Increased By ▲ 2.08 (2.41%)
PAEL 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
PIBTL 4.25 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.47%)
PPL 79.35 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.06%)
PRL 13.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.17%)
SILK 0.90 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.12%)
SNGP 41.40 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.32%)
TELE 5.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
TPLP 15.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.63%)
TRG 111.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-0.63%)
UNITY 13.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.93%)
WTL 1.17 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.54%)
BR100 4,029 Increased By 2.6 (0.06%)
BR30 14,451 Increased By 48.2 (0.33%)
KSE100 40,519 Increased By 68.3 (0.17%)
KSE30 15,128 Increased By 18.3 (0.12%)
BR Research

On internet freedom

With the passage of time, cyberspace has become prominent for human rights like freedom of speech and expression. Th
Published December 6, 2019 Updated December 7, 2019
Follow us

With the passage of time, cyberspace has become prominent for human rights like freedom of speech and expression. The diverse battleground over what is right and wrong politically, socially and culturally is increasingly shifting into the cloud. But beyond that, unfortunately, the quest for genuine persuasion, activism and engagement is made for difficult amid the rise of disinformation and distant troll armies.

In such an environment, it didn’t take too long for Western think-tanks to start measuring what they call “internet freedom” as a marker of how liberal or illiberal is a country towards tolerating online criticism. Some countries look good, others look bad. This leads to a debate, which sometimes morphs into controversy, on how a particular methodology doesn’t quite capture realities on the ground and is incapable to adjust for local context.

So it was when a US-based think tank, Freedom House, launched its latest Internet Freedom index last month, and the local authorities didn’t take to it. The report, titled “The Crisis of Social Media,” suggests that nearly three-fourth of roughly 4 billion Internet users live in countries where people were detained or put behind bars for their social media posts. Pakistan figures prominently among such countries.

For the period between June 2018 and May 2019, Pakistan is cited among those countries that are “not free,” especially when it comes to access to and rights on the Internet. Specifically, Pakistan received a score of 26 on the Freedom Index, placing the country at number 9, at the bottom tier of the index, among 65 countries. The bottom five countries on the list are China, Syria, Iran, Cuba and Vietnam.

The report suggested that under the garb of countering hate speech and extremism, the local authorities were harassing citizens and journalists through legal, technical and physical means. Limited internet access in some areas, blocking of websites, arrests and tortures, and disinformation campaigns were cited among the major factors causing a decline in Pakistan’s internet freedom.

Perhaps viewing the report as a damning indictment, the telecoms regulator, PTA, came up with a response last week to contest the country’s “unfair” portrayal. In a letter to Freedom House, the regulator faults the secondary research undertaken on the basis of news articles, which PTA deems inadequate. Views of PTA and other relevant stakeholders should have been incorporated, the letter reads.

The PTA’s pushback is valid on some counts. But on others, it cites adherence to local laws, notably the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (2016), to justify actions such as web monitoring and blocking of unlawful content. The regulator has a tough act to follow – it has to significantly increase broadband penetration but at the same time ensure that online platforms are not becoming counter-productive.

For the country to productively deploy information and communication technologies, Pakistanis need affordable access as well as openness in the cyberspace for critical thinking to take root and take the country forward. In the end, it is expected of the elected representatives, who passed cybercrime laws in the first place, to reassess existing constitutional safeguards for the people’s right to free speech.

Comments

Comments are closed.

On internet freedom

SBP denies USD rate capping caused loss

Import of used tractors: ECC asks MoC, SBP to rethink

IMF conditionalities: Govt raises fuel prices in a gesture of compliance

Imran Khan censures govt for ‘massive’ fuel hike

Dar says fiscal discipline has to be imposed

Hike to fuel inflation: Tarin

Decline in cess collection lands body in trouble: Food ministry seeks Rs666.64m grant for cotton committee

PKR slide likely to fuel inflation in a big way

Israel appears to have been behind drone strike on Iran: US official

Termination of SEL’s LoS: PPIB seeks comments from CPPA-G, NTDC