BR100 Increased By (1.44%)
BR30 Increased By (1.71%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.14%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.16%)
BECO 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.89%)
BML 62.18 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (1.88%)
BOP 33.85 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.8%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.37%)
DCL 11.54 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.12%)
FCCL 53.83 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.7%)
FCSC 5.41 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.31%)
FFL 17.85 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.36%)
FNEL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.53%)
HUMNL 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
KEL 8.03 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.77%)
KOSM 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.13%)
MLCF 86.77 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (1.66%)
NBP 184.32 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (1.67%)
PACE 11.75 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.91%)
PAEL 40.22 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (2.06%)
PIAHCLA 26.00 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.44%)
PIBTL 17.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.34%)
PPL 228.38 Increased By ▲ 3.56 (1.58%)
PRL 34.60 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.23%)
PTC 66.45 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.11%)
SEARL 91.11 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (1.69%)
SSGC 26.69 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.44%)
TELE 8.46 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.95%)
THCCL 71.52 Increased By ▲ 2.18 (3.14%)
TPLP 10.87 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (5.74%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.61%)
TRG 70.82 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (1.84%)
WAVES 11.29 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.36%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.57%)
Business & Finance

SHC denies eateries exemption from Ramazan Ordinance

HYDERABAD: The Sindh High Court has rejected another 356 petitions filed by the eateries seeking exemption from Ehtr
Published May 9, 2019 Updated May 9, 2019 03:30pm

HYDERABAD: The Sindh High Court has rejected another 356 petitions filed by the eateries seeking exemption from Ehtram-e-Ramazan Ordinance, 1981, following a similar order last week in which 262 petitions were dismissed.

The Hyderabad Circuit Bench comprising justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro and justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui underlined that the ordinance's section 5 had restricted exemptions to only certain places.

Such places include a canteen or a kitchen in a hospital; a restaurant, a canteen or a stall in the premises of a railway station, airport, seaport, train, aircraft or bus stand; and a kitchen or a canteen in a primary school.

"Since in all the petitions, the places mentioned do not fall within exemption given under section 5 of the Ordinance, therefore, all the petitions are dismissed," the SHC's order reads.

Furthermore, the Hyderabad Circuit Bench directed all the District and Session Judges in the province as well as all the Deputy Commissioners to ensure that no restaurant, hotel, stall or tea shop operated during the hours of fasting.

The justices also ordered Hyderabad's Deputy Commissioner not to allow any restaurant, hotel, stall or tea shop which operated in the public places to open during the hours of fasting.

The court asked the eateries which do not fall under section 5 of the ordinance to approach the Deputy Commissioners to seek permission.

The petitioners had maintained that their eateries were located along the bus stops.

However, the SHC clarified that the ordinance only allowed the eateries to operate within the premises of the bus stands.

"... it doesn't mean the roadside bus stop or layover which is a point where a bus stops for boarding or alighting passengers during transition between terminus. A bus stand is a designated parking location," the justices observed.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.