AIRLINK 74.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.88%)
BOP 5.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.92%)
CNERGY 4.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.23%)
DFML 29.30 Increased By ▲ 1.66 (6.01%)
DGKC 77.14 Increased By ▲ 5.14 (7.14%)
FCCL 21.38 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (5.37%)
FFBL 30.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.48%)
FFL 10.19 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.21%)
GGL 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (4.67%)
HBL 114.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.09%)
HUBC 130.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.57%)
HUMNL 6.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.02%)
KEL 4.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.62%)
KOSM 4.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.63%)
MLCF 39.78 Increased By ▲ 2.70 (7.28%)
OGDC 134.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.36%)
PAEL 24.41 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (4.32%)
PIAA 27.36 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.18%)
PIBTL 6.71 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.67%)
PPL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.74%)
PRL 28.85 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.35%)
PTC 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.61%)
SEARL 57.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.12%)
SNGP 67.15 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.24%)
SSGC 11.17 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.66%)
TPLP 12.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 70.53 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.2%)
UNITY 24.00 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.48%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
BR100 7,477 Increased By 22.4 (0.3%)
BR30 24,380 Increased By 129.6 (0.53%)
KSE100 71,708 Increased By 274.6 (0.38%)
KSE30 23,653 Increased By 87.1 (0.37%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has sought replies from the federal government and the Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) by January 2022 in response to a petition challenging the appointment of SECP Chairman Amir Ali Khan.

Petitioner Asad Kharal through his counsel contended that the SECP consisted of five commissioners including the chairman. He said the respondent, Amir Khan, was appointed as the commissioner of SECP on December 7, 2018, without resigning from the post of executive director of SECP. He stated that the respondent tampered the record and tendered his resignation from his previous position in back date.

He said the Ministry of Finance was never intimated regarding resignation of the respondent. He also said that a person could not hold two positions governed under separate provisions of law. He further contended that the respondent was not qualified and did not have the requisite experience to be appointed as chairman. He alleged that the respondent retained his both positions for nine months till his appointment as the Chairman SECP.

The counsel, therefore, argued that the appointment of the respondent as chairman was in sheer violation of law and judgments of the Supreme Court. He, therefore, prayed the court to set aside the appointment of the respondent as Chairman SECP.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.