AVN 64.76 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BAFL 31.49 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.99%)
BOP 4.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.62%)
CNERGY 3.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 14.48 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (3.43%)
DGKC 41.65 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
EPCL 46.81 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.1%)
FCCL 11.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.61%)
FFL 5.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FLYNG 5.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.34%)
GGL 10.46 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (5.55%)
HUBC 65.54 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (2.09%)
HUMNL 5.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KAPCO 27.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.32%)
KEL 2.16 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.47%)
LOTCHEM 24.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.41%)
MLCF 21.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.56%)
NETSOL 84.61 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.37%)
OGDC 87.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.1%)
PAEL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.46%)
PIBTL 4.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.95%)
PPL 75.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-1.86%)
PRL 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.95%)
SILK 0.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-3.26%)
SNGP 41.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.79%)
TELE 5.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.85%)
TPLP 15.62 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
TRG 111.84 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.53%)
UNITY 13.97 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.94%)
WTL 1.17 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.63%)
BR100 4,064 Increased By 18.2 (0.45%)
BR30 14,468 Increased By 34.8 (0.24%)
KSE100 40,734 Increased By 113.6 (0.28%)
KSE30 15,230 Increased By 59.4 (0.39%)
Follow us

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has announced that the taxpayer or his authorised representative would not be required to personally appear before Inland Revenue officers during the whole audit proceedings under the new e-audit system.

The FBR has issued procedure for e-audit through a notification to amend Income Tax Rules, 2002.

Under the new facility, the “e-audit” means the audit proceedings of registered person conducted through electronic means including video links, or any other facility as may be specified by the Board from time to time.

The major role would be played by the “Automated Case Selection System”, which is an algorithm for randomised allocation of cases by using suitable technological modes.

Under the procedure, where a case has been selected under Section 177 or Section 2I4C of the Income Tax Ordinance, the competent authority may issue direction to conduct e-audit.

The cases selected for e-audit shall be processed through Automated Case Selection System, which will create an assignment for issuing notices through the IRIS to the taxpayer against selection of cases for audit.

For issuance of notices, the Automated Case Selection System will configure the list of officers of Inland Revenue to whom the case can be assigned; and list of the cases to be marked across the jurisdiction; and thereafter, intimate to the concerned commissioner IR.

The Automated Case Selection System will once again configure and assign the case to any adjudication officer across the jurisdiction to make an order for assessment of tax under Section 122, including imposition of penalty and default surcharge in accordance with sections 182 and 205 of the Ordinance, if required, as pointed out in the audit report.

Where the case has been assigned by the Automated Case Selection System, the concerned Commissioner Inland Revenue, where the case has been assigned by the Automated Case Selection System, shall serve a notice, specifying the reasons for selection of his case for audit.

The taxpayer shall produce the record or documents including books of accounts maintained under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through the IRIS or electronic data carrier notified by the Board.

The taxpayer shall not be required to appear either personally or through authorised representative in connection with any proceedings under e-audit before the officer of Inland Revenue.

In case of any explanation required by the taxpayer or officer of Inland Revenue, requests for personal hearing, shall be made through the IRIS and may be allowed to do so in assigned jurisdiction and such hearings shall be conducted exclusively through video links from personal computer system or any of the nearest Tax Facilitation Centre situated at the premises of the different tax offices, as the case may be.

The audit officer, if finds no discrepancy and have no conclusive proof against taxpayer, may close the audit and send it to the Automated Case Selection System.

However, if the audit officer to whom the case is assigned, does not agree with the declared version and proposes order for assessment of tax, shall prepare an audit report, containing audit observations/ findings and forward the report to taxpayer through IRIS and Automated Case Selection System simultaneously.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.

Audit proceedings: Taxpayer or rep not required to appear before IR officers: FBR

KSA links oil refinery’s setup with political consensus

Panel asks PD to broker agreements between govt, gas producing provinces

PM invites IK, others to APC on terrorism, economy

Jul-Jan trade deficit shrinks 31.97pc to $19.632bn YoY

Dar approves proposal to raise $2bn from expats

Rules notified: FBR, banks can share info about civil servants’ assets

IK writes letter to President: Agencies accused of meddling in political affairs

Broadcast journalist arrested

Smuggling not the main reason behind USD shortage: FBR

SBP’s reserves slip to $3bn