AIRLINK 73.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.46 (-1.94%)
BOP 5.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.28%)
CNERGY 4.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.68%)
DFML 28.90 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (4.56%)
DGKC 76.65 Increased By ▲ 4.65 (6.46%)
FCCL 20.31 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.1%)
FFBL 30.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.64%)
FFL 10.08 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.1%)
GGL 10.54 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.63%)
HBL 114.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.43%)
HUBC 130.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-0.53%)
HUMNL 6.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.31%)
KEL 4.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-3.33%)
KOSM 4.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.1%)
MLCF 39.37 Increased By ▲ 2.29 (6.18%)
OGDC 134.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-0.92%)
PAEL 24.05 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (2.78%)
PIAA 27.36 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.18%)
PIBTL 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.21%)
PPL 113.40 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.21%)
PRL 28.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.7%)
PTC 15.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-2.77%)
SEARL 57.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.58%)
SNGP 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.28%)
SSGC 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
TELE 9.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.44%)
TPLP 12.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.41%)
TRG 70.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.55%)
UNITY 23.70 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.21%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
BR100 7,449 Decreased By -6.1 (-0.08%)
BR30 24,247 Decreased By -2.9 (-0.01%)
KSE100 71,432 Decreased By -1.2 (-0%)
KSE30 23,573 Increased By 7 (0.03%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has announced that the taxpayer or his authorised representative would not be required to personally appear before Inland Revenue officers during the whole audit proceedings under the new e-audit system.

The FBR has issued procedure for e-audit through a notification to amend Income Tax Rules, 2002.

Under the new facility, the “e-audit” means the audit proceedings of registered person conducted through electronic means including video links, or any other facility as may be specified by the Board from time to time.

The major role would be played by the “Automated Case Selection System”, which is an algorithm for randomised allocation of cases by using suitable technological modes.

Under the procedure, where a case has been selected under Section 177 or Section 2I4C of the Income Tax Ordinance, the competent authority may issue direction to conduct e-audit.

The cases selected for e-audit shall be processed through Automated Case Selection System, which will create an assignment for issuing notices through the IRIS to the taxpayer against selection of cases for audit.

For issuance of notices, the Automated Case Selection System will configure the list of officers of Inland Revenue to whom the case can be assigned; and list of the cases to be marked across the jurisdiction; and thereafter, intimate to the concerned commissioner IR.

The Automated Case Selection System will once again configure and assign the case to any adjudication officer across the jurisdiction to make an order for assessment of tax under Section 122, including imposition of penalty and default surcharge in accordance with sections 182 and 205 of the Ordinance, if required, as pointed out in the audit report.

Where the case has been assigned by the Automated Case Selection System, the concerned Commissioner Inland Revenue, where the case has been assigned by the Automated Case Selection System, shall serve a notice, specifying the reasons for selection of his case for audit.

The taxpayer shall produce the record or documents including books of accounts maintained under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through the IRIS or electronic data carrier notified by the Board.

The taxpayer shall not be required to appear either personally or through authorised representative in connection with any proceedings under e-audit before the officer of Inland Revenue.

In case of any explanation required by the taxpayer or officer of Inland Revenue, requests for personal hearing, shall be made through the IRIS and may be allowed to do so in assigned jurisdiction and such hearings shall be conducted exclusively through video links from personal computer system or any of the nearest Tax Facilitation Centre situated at the premises of the different tax offices, as the case may be.

The audit officer, if finds no discrepancy and have no conclusive proof against taxpayer, may close the audit and send it to the Automated Case Selection System.

However, if the audit officer to whom the case is assigned, does not agree with the declared version and proposes order for assessment of tax, shall prepare an audit report, containing audit observations/ findings and forward the report to taxpayer through IRIS and Automated Case Selection System simultaneously.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.