AIRLINK 77.85 Increased By ▲ 4.85 (6.64%)
BOP 5.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 28.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.75%)
DGKC 78.25 Increased By ▲ 3.96 (5.33%)
FCCL 20.66 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.52%)
FFBL 31.85 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (3.07%)
FFL 10.26 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.99%)
GGL 10.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.96%)
HBL 118.50 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (2.18%)
HUBC 134.75 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (1.93%)
HUMNL 6.72 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.6%)
KEL 4.14 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.73%)
KOSM 4.81 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.57%)
MLCF 39.06 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.35%)
OGDC 134.74 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (0.66%)
PAEL 23.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.59%)
PIAA 26.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-2.29%)
PIBTL 7.04 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (4.14%)
PPL 113.20 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.35%)
PRL 27.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-2.06%)
PTC 14.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.08%)
SEARL 56.81 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.69%)
SNGP 65.99 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.29%)
SSGC 10.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
TELE 9.14 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.33%)
TPLP 11.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.18%)
TRG 69.99 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.29%)
UNITY 23.93 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.93%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.75%)
BR100 7,496 Increased By 61.4 (0.83%)
BR30 24,541 Increased By 321.2 (1.33%)
KSE100 72,073 Increased By 714.1 (1%)
KSE30 23,811 Increased By 244.2 (1.04%)

LAHORE: Lahore High Court Chief Justice on Tuesday observed that the stay order by a civil court needed to be honoured and complied with and restrained the district government from demolishing “Khokhar Palace” further, a residence of PML-N MPA Saiful Malook Khokhar. The Chief Justice suspended a directive of deputy commissioner Lahore about bulldozing the palace and advised both the parties to approach the civil court for the resolution of the dispute.

The chief justice also restrained the Khokhar brothers from reconstructing the demolished property till a decision by a civil court.

Earlier, representing the petitioner, Ahsan Bhoon told the court that the government demolished the property in violation of a stay order passed by a civil court and that too without issuing prior notices. He said the petitioner had been subjected to political victimization. A law officer said a prior notice had been served upon the petitioner before operation and pasted at the property as well. He also opposed the maintainability of the petition and said the petitioner did not approach the court with clean hands. Advocate Bhoon said a high-level committee previously formed by the Supreme Court had declared the petitioner lawful owner of the property in question.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.