ANL 32.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.40 (-6.9%)
ASC 13.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-5.19%)
ASL 22.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-2.1%)
AVN 83.92 Decreased By ▼ -6.18 (-6.86%)
BOP 8.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.89%)
BYCO 8.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-5.4%)
DGKC 118.25 Decreased By ▼ -8.90 (-7%)
EPCL 47.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.63%)
FCCL 22.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-5.82%)
FFBL 25.50 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.63%)
FFL 14.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-4.73%)
HASCOL 10.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.46%)
HUBC 82.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-2.15%)
HUMNL 6.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-6.17%)
JSCL 23.53 Decreased By ▼ -1.62 (-6.44%)
KAPCO 39.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.14%)
KEL 3.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.76%)
LOTCHEM 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.42%)
MLCF 43.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-2.27%)
PAEL 33.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.75 (-5.01%)
PIBTL 10.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-3.73%)
POWER 9.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-7.06%)
PPL 87.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.10 (-2.33%)
PRL 24.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-5.72%)
PTC 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-3.49%)
SILK 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-5.43%)
SNGP 38.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.62 (-4.06%)
TRG 135.40 Decreased By ▼ -7.60 (-5.31%)
UNITY 28.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.03 (-6.61%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-7.3%)
BR100 4,719 Decreased By ▼ -117.04 (-2.42%)
BR30 24,107 Decreased By ▼ -866.29 (-3.47%)
KSE100 44,047 Decreased By ▼ -1004.45 (-2.23%)
KSE30 18,503 Decreased By ▼ -367.25 (-1.95%)

Nishat Mills Limited (PSX: NML) was established in 1951. Its name is widely known in the textile sector of the country. It is one of the companies of the larger Nishat group of companies. The latter is present in quite a few of the sectors: textiles, cement, banking and insurance, power generation, hotel industry, agriculture, dairy and paper products.

Nishat Mills has spinning, weaving processing, home textile and garments units, in addition to power generation. It also has its own retail store for the sale of its textile related products.

Shareholding pattern

A little over 25 percent of the total shareholding is with the directors, CEO, their spouses and minor children. Of this Mr. Mian Umer Mansha, the CEO and director of the company owns 12.6 percent of the shares while Mr. Mian Hassan Mansha, the director and chairman of the company holds 12.6 percent. Around 24 percent of the total shares are distributed with the local general public, while close to 14 percent is held by foreign companies.

Historical operational performance

Nishat Mills has mostly seen positive growth in its topline in a little more than a decade, with the exception of a few years. Although profit margins have been fluctuating over the period, they have remained in the green.

Looking at the last five years, profit margins declined for three years before recovering in FY19. During FY15, the topline reduced by almost 6 percent owing to rupee appreciation which made exports uncompetitive in the international market, while demand was already low. Prices also did not increase much. On the costs side, cost of production increased as a percentage of revenue to make up 88 percent of the revenue- up from 85 percent in FY14. This was due to increase in minimum wages; salary and wages expense went up by almost 10 percent. All other expenses as a percentage of revenue also increased thus contracting year on year profit margins.

Despite the near stagnant growth in the textile industry of the country owing to low demand and intense competition from regional peers, the company managed to improve its profit margins. However, the lower sales for the year were reflective of the poor performance of the sector. Nishat’s topline reduced by a little over 6 percent; gross profit increased due to effective cost controls and focus on value added business, although as a percentage of revenue, it only declined by 1 percent. Other income derived from dividend income played a significant role to improve operating margins whereas a major reduction in finance costs helped lift the net margin. Finance cost reduced due to better cash flows as well as a decline in borrowing cost from 6.8 percent in the previous year to 4.6 percent in FY16.

In FY17, the company saw its topline recovering as it registered a marginal growth of 2.6 percent. Export sales contributed to this as local sales actually reduced in FY17. Although the international market was still noted by slow demand, the company managed to increase sales. However, this was accompanied by an increase in costs as the latter consumed 89 percent of the revenue; this kind of consumption of revenue was seen for the first time in a decade. The rise in costs was mostly driven by an increase in wages and salaries expense in response to a rise is minimum wages; fuel and power expense also saw a 17 percent incline. In spite of other income increasing year on year, it could not keep with the rise in costs which reduced the net margin to 8.65 percent, down from 10 percent in FY16.

Revenue continued to increase gradually as it grew by 9 percent year on year. In addition to an increase in export sales due to favourable exchange rate, the company also earned revenue in duty drawback incentive of Rs443 million. However, the increase in revenue again failed to lift profit margins as cost of production further climbed to consume more than 89 percent of the revenue; raw material cost and salaries and wages expense contributed mostly to this incline. Other income which largely supported the operating and net margins also reduced for the year which further lowered profitability.

Topline doubled relative to last year to grow at 18 percent in FY19. Majority of the increase was brought in by increase in exports sales as currency devalued by around 35 percent during the year. Costs reduced only marginally, despite the availability of electricity at subsidized rates. Another factor for this was the currency devaluation also had an adverse impact on imported raw material. Other income, again, helped in uplifting profitability as it made up 8 percent of the revenue and 60 percent of the operating profit; the effect of this was seen in the improved net margins for the year.

Quarterly results and future outlook

Although topline grew by 6 percent year on year during 9MFY20, due to favourable exchange rate, it could not offset the increase in costs; currency devaluation caused price of imports to rise. Cost of production made up 88 percent of the revenue, while other costs also an increase which crippled profit margins year on year. Other income was also lower for the year due to decreased dividend income. Thus there was a nearly 30 percent reduction in net margin year on year in 9MFY20.

Since Pakistan depends on China for its raw materials, the outbreak of Covid-19 and the resultant shut down of manufacturing facilities in China put the supply of raw material into question. As the virus spread, manufacturing facilities within the country were also shut down and operating at less than optimum capacity. While the third quarter did not reflect the full effect of reduced business activity, the last quarter of FY20 may see the impact.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020